Anti-snake behavior and snake discrimination in vervet monkeys

Lukas Schad,Erica van de Waal,Julia Fischer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.04.602064

2024-07-08

Abstract:Anti-predator behavior allows to investigate how animals classify potential threats in their environment and which cognitive mechanisms might be involved in risk assessment. Snakes are common predators for many primate species, yet most of our knowledge on primate anti-snake behavior stems from predator model experiments. Few studies have investigated natural predator-prey interactions. Here, we combine an observational study on anti-snake behavior in free-ranging vervet monkeys, Chlorocebus pygerythrus, with an experimental study of snake classification, to achieve an integrated understanding of the monkeys' responses to and classification of snakes. Over 25 months, we gathered data from over 200 individuals in five groups and recorded natural encounters between vervet monkeys and five different species of snakes. We assessed whether the time that monkeys spent inspecting snakes from close by varied with the encountered species. We further examined whether age and sex classes differed in their propensity to inspect snakes or alarm call. Pythons were associated with higher average inspection durations and were more likely to elicit inspection responses. While adult males were less likely to approach and inspect snakes, we found no effect of age or sex on alarm calling probability. Alarm calling appeared to be restricted to individuals in close proximity to snakes, suggesting that recruitment of nearby group members is an essential function of this call type. In the experiments, we tested whether vervet monkeys discriminated snake models by length and/or diameter, but found no effect of model size on the intensity of anti-snake behavior. While the experimental data showed the same trends as data from natural encounters, responses towards model pythons were much stronger than responses towards real pythons. These results point to a potential sampling bias in predator model experiments that needs to be taken into account when assessing data from experiments alone.

Animal Behavior and Cognition

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper discusses the behavioral responses and categorization abilities of vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) towards snakes. The study combines observation and experimental methods to understand how monkeys cope with the threat of snakes in their natural environment and how they differentiate between different types of snakes. Over a period of 25 months, observations were made of over 200 individuals interacting with five different snake species. The results indicate that monkeys spend more time inspecting pythons and are more likely to exhibit inspection responses towards pythons. Adult males are less inclined to approach and inspect snakes, but age and gender do not significantly affect the probability of emitting alarm calls. The experimental part of the study found that monkeys do not adjust their anti-snake behavior based on the length and diameter of snake models, but their response to the model python is stronger than to a real python, which may reveal a potential sample bias in the experiment.

The paper also points out that while vervet monkeys display different responses to different snake species, knowledge about how they precisely categorize and assess the risks of snakes based on their characteristics (such as size) is currently limited. The study emphasizes the need for more observational data on animal responses to actual predators in natural environments to complement experimental research. Additionally, the study discusses the potential roles of age, gender, and social structure in anti-snake behavior, such as males potentially emitting fewer alarm calls due to fewer kin relationships. Finally, the authors suggest further research on how monkeys identify and respond to different snake threats based on visual cues.