Functional traits explain growth resistance to successive hotter droughts across a wide set of common and future tree species in Europe

Lena Kretz,Florian Schnabel,Ronny Richter,Anika Raabgrund,Jens Kattge,Karl Andraczek,Anja Kahl,Tom Kuenne,Christian Wirth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.04.602057
2024-07-08
Abstract:In many regions worldwide, forests suffer from climate change-induced droughts. The "hotter drought" in Europe in 2018 with the consecutive drought years 2019 and 2020 caused large-scale growth declines and forest dieback. We investigated if tree growth responses to the 2018 to 2020 drought can be explained by tree functional traits related to drought tolerance, growth, and resource acquisition. We assessed growth resistance, that is, growth during drought compared to pre-drought-conditions, in 71 planted tree species using branch shoot increments. We leveraged gap-filled trait data related to drought tolerance (P50, stomata density and conductivity), growth and resource acquisition (SLA, LNC, C:N, Amax) and wood density from the TRY database to explain growth resistance for gymnosperms and angiosperms. We found significantly reduced growth during drought across all species. Legacy effects further decreased growth resistance in 2019 and 2020. Gymnosperms showed decreasing growth resistance with increasing P50 and acquisitiveness, such as high SLA, LNC, and Amax. Similar results were found for angiosperms, however, with less clear pattern. Four distinct response types emerged: "Sufferer", "Late sufferer", "Recoverer" and "Resisters", with gymnosperms predominately falling into the "Sufferer" and "Late sufferer" categories. Our study provides evidence for significant growth reductions and legacy effects in response to consecutive hotter droughts, which can be explained by functional traits across a wide set of tree species. The a posteriori classification into response types revealed the diversity of temporal responses to a prolonged drought. We conclude that high drought tolerance bolsters growth resistance, while acquisitive species suffer stronger under drought.
Ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?