Abstract:In 4 days post‐fertilization zebrafish larvae, the fast axial muscle fibres follow helical trajectories that taper towards the tail. Adjacent muscle fibres form substantial angles relative to each other to accommodate this pattern. Using a novel semi‐automatic method, we quantified 3D fibre angles over the whole muscle volume. Our findings suggest muscle‐fibre architecture likely aids swimming performance, but other factors also influence the pattern. Most teleost fish propel themselves with lateral body waves powered by their axial muscles. These muscles also power suction feeding through rapid expansion of the mouth cavity. They consist of muscle segments (myomeres), separated by connective tissue sheets (myosepts). In adult teleosts, the fast axial muscle fibres follow pseudo‐helical trajectories, which are thought to distribute strain (relative fibre length change) approximately evenly across transverse sections during swimming, thereby optimizing power generation. To achieve strain equalization, a significant angle to the longitudinal axis on the frontal plane (azimuth) is necessary near the medial plane, increasing strain. Additionally, a deviation from longitudinal orientation on the sagittal plane (elevation) is required laterally to decrease strain. Despite several detailed morphological studies, our understanding of muscle‐fibre orientations in the entire axial musculature of fish remains incomplete. Furthermore, most research has been done in post‐larval stages, leaving a knowledge gap regarding the changing axial muscle architecture during larval development. Larval fish exhibit different body size, body shape and swimming kinematics compared to adults. They experience relatively high viscous forces, requiring higher tail‐beat amplitudes to overcome increased drag. Additionally, larval fish swim with higher tail‐beat frequencies. Histological studies have shown that in larval fish, muscle fibres in the anal region transition from an almost longitudinal orientation to a pseudo‐helical pattern by 3 dpf (days post‐fertilization). However, these studies were limited to a few sections of the body and were prone to shrinkage and tissue damage. Here, we introduce a novel methodology for quantifying muscle‐fibre orientations along the entire axial muscles. We selected 4 dpf larval zebrafish for our analyses, a stage where larvae are actively swimming but not yet free‐feeding. High‐resolution confocal 3D scans were obtained from four genetically modified zebrafish expressing green fluorescent protein in fast muscle fibres. Fluorescence variation allowed segmentation of individual muscle fibres, which were then converted to fish‐bound coordinates by correcting for the fish's position and orientation in the scan, and normalized to pool results across individuals. We show that at 4 dpf, muscle‐fibre trajectories exhibit a helical pattern tapering towards the tail. Average fibre angles decrease from anterior to posterior, with azimuth varying over the dorsoventral axis and elevation varying over the mediolateral axis. Notably, only the anteriormost 20% of the body displayed higher azimuth angles near the medial plane. Angles between neighbouring fibres were substantial, particularly at the rim of the epaxial and hypaxial muscles. The revealed muscle‐fibre architecture at this age presumably contributes to the swimming performance of these larvae, but that swimming performance is probably not the only driving factor for the fibre pattern. Our methodology offers a promising avenue for exploring muscle‐fibre orientations across ontogenetic series and provides a foundation for in‐depth functional studies on the role of muscle architecture in facilitating swimming performance of larval fish.

Physical constraints on the positions and dimensions of the zebrafish swim bladder by surrounding bones

Zebrafish sox2 Is Required for the Swim Bladder Inflation by Controlling the Swim-Up Behavior

Independent size regulation of bones and appendages in zebrafish

Loss of scleraxis leads to distinct reduction of mineralized intermuscular bone in zebrafish

Size control during organogenesis: Development of the lateral line organs in zebrafish

Spinal Cord Elongation Enables Proportional Regulation of the Zebrafish Posterior Body

The Hox code responsible for the patterning of the anterior vertebrae in zebrafish

Anterior-posterior constraint on Hedgehog signaling by hhip in teleost fin elaboration

Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Conserved Branching Morphogenesis Related Genes Involved in Chamber Formation of Catfish Swimbladder

Single-cell transcriptomes and runx2b−/− mutants reveal the genetic signatures of intermuscular bone formation in zebrafish

Teleost Hox code defines regional identities competent for the formation of dorsal and anal fins

A conserved regulation of cell expansion underlies notochord mechanics, spine morphogenesis, and endochondral bone lengthening

Bmp-signaling and the finfold size in zebrafish: implications for the fin-to-limb transition

Postembryonic screen for mutations affecting spine development in zebrafish

Exposure to thiourea during the early stages of development impedes the formation of the swim bladder in zebrafish larvae

OSSIFICATION PATTERNS OF INTERMUSCULAR BONES IN DIFFERENT FISH SPECIES

Bioelectric Signaling Regulates Size in Zebrafish Fins

The functional roles of zebrafish HoxA- and HoxD-related clusters in the pectoral fin development

Long-Distance Descending Commissural V0v Neurons Ensure Coordinated Swimming Movements Along The Body Axis in Larval Zebrafish

Development of Teleost Intermuscular Bones Undergoing Intramembranous Ossification Based on Histological-Transcriptomic-Proteomic Data

Axial muscle‐fibre orientations in larval zebrafish