Abstract:A vital heuristic used when making judgements on whether audio-visual signals arise from the same event, is the temporal coincidence of the respective signals. Previous research has highlighted a process, whereby the perception of simultaneity rapidly recalibrates to account for differences in the physical temporal offsets of stimuli. The current paper investigated whether rapid recalibration also occurs in response to differences in central arrival latencies, driven by visual-intensity-dependent processing times. In a behavioural experiment, observers completed a temporal-order judgement (TOJ), simultaneity judgement (SJ) and simple reaction-time (RT) task and responded to audio-visual trials that were preceded by other audio-visual trials with either a bright or dim visual stimulus. It was found that the point of subjective simultaneity shifted, due to the visual intensity of the preceding stimulus, in the TOJ, but not SJ task, while the RT data revealed no effect of preceding intensity. Our data therefore provide some evidence that the perception of simultaneity rapidly recalibrates based on stimulus intensity. A vital heuristic used when making judgements on whether audio-visual signals arise from the same event, is the temporal coincidence of the respective signals. Previous research has highlighted a process, whereby the perception of simultaneity rapidly recalibrates to account for differences in the physical temporal offsets of stimuli. The current paper investigated whether rapid recalibration also occurs in response to differences in central arrival latencies, driven by visual-intensity-dependent processing times. In a behavioural experiment, observers completed a temporal-order judgement (TOJ), simultaneity judgement (SJ) and simple reaction-time (RT) task and responded to audio-visual trials that were preceded by other audio-visual trials with either a bright or dim visual stimulus. It was found that the point of subjective simultaneity shifted, due to the visual intensity of the preceding stimulus, in the TOJ, but not SJ task, while the RT data revealed no effect of preceding intensity. Our data therefore provide some evidence that the perception of simultaneity rapidly recalibrates based on stimulus intensity. A vital heuristic used when making judgements on whether audio-visual signals arise from the same event, is the temporal coincidence of the respective signals. Previous research has highlighted a process, whereby the perception of simultaneity rapidly recalibrates to account for differences in the physical temporal offsets of stimuli. The current paper investigated whether rapid recalibration also occurs in response to differences in central arrival latencies, driven by visual-intensity-dependent processing times. In a behavioural experiment, observers completed a temporal-order judgement (TOJ), simultaneity judgement (SJ) and simple reaction-time (RT) task and responded to audio-visual trials that were preceded by other audio-visual trials with either a bright or dim visual stimulus. It was found that the point of subjective simultaneity shifted, due to the visual intensity of the preceding stimulus, in the TOJ, but not SJ task, while the RT data revealed no effect of preceding intensity. Our data therefore provide some evidence that the perception of simultaneity rapidly recalibrates based on stimulus intensity.

Startling acoustic stimuli hasten reflexive choice reaching tasks by strengthening, but not changing the timing of, express visuomotor responses

The Effects of the StartReact on Reaction Time, Rate of Force Development, and Muscle Activity in Biceps Brachii

Does the movement matter? Determinants of the latency of temporally urgent motor reactions

Startling stimuli increase maximal motor unit discharge rate and rate of force development in humans

Altered frontoparietal activity in acoustic startle priming tasks during reticulospinal tract facilitation: An fNIRS study

Rapid integration of face detection and task set in visually guided reaching

Salient Sounds Activate Human Visual Cortex Automatically

Tactile suppression is linked to movement onset for startle-triggered responses

Effects of an Auditory Versus Visual Stimulus on Reaction and Response Time During Countermovement Jumps

Dissociable Effects of Urgency and Evidence Accumulation during Reaching Revealed by Dynamic Multisensory Integration

Investigating acoustic startle habituation and prepulse inhibition with silent functional MRI and electromyography in young, healthy adults

Preparatory activity in premotor and motor cortex reflects the speed of the upcoming reach

Using intracranial electrical stimulation to study the timing of prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex.

The Utilisation of Visual Information in the Control of Rapid Interceptive Actions

Distraction by auditory novelty during reading: Evidence for disruption in saccade planning, but not saccade execution

Task-irrelevant stimuli reliably boost phasic pupil-linked arousal but do not affect decision formation

Effect of Temporal Predictability on the Neural Processing of Self-Triggered Auditory Stimulation During Vocalization

Involuntary motor responses are elicited both by rare sounds and rare pitch changes

Perceived Audio-Visual Simultaneity Is Recalibrated by the Visual Intensity of the Preceding Trial

Eccentricity-Dependent Saccadic Reaction Time: The Roles of Foveal Magnification and Attentional Orienting

Voluntary action sharpens sensory prediction and facilitates neural processing of contingent sensory stimuli