The impact of ethical implications intertwined with tuberculosis household contact investigation: a qualitative study

Lebohang M Mlambo,Minja Milovanovic,Colleen F Hanrahan,Matshidiso T Morolo,Mbali P Mohlamonyane,Nicholas W Albaugh,Khatija Ahmed,Neil A Martinson,David W Dowdy,Nora West

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.27.24309538

2024-06-28

Abstract:Background Household contact investigation (HCI) is an effective and widely used approach to identify persons with tuberculosis (TB) disease and infection, globally. Despite widespread recommendations for use of HCI, there is limited understanding of the influence and value of contact investigation for participants, and how household contact investigation impacts psychosocial factors including stigma, and possible unintended disclosure of illness among persons with TB, their families, and communities. Methods This exploratory qualitative study nested within a randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: , 17 August 2020) was conducted in South Africa to understand the impacts of HCI on index patients living with TB and their household contact persons in two rural districts in the Limpopo province (Vhembe and Capricorn) and in Soshanguve, a peri-urban township in Gauteng province. People with TB and household members of people with TB were recruited to take part in in-depth interviews and focus group discussions using semi-structured guides. We explored individual, interpersonal, and community-level perceptions of potential impacts of household contact investigation to elucidate their perceptions of HCI. Thematic analysis identified key themes. Results Twenty-four individual interviews and six focus group discussions (n=39 participants) were conducted. Participants viewed HCI as an effective approach in finding TB cases, useful for educating households about TB symptoms and reducing barriers to health-related services. At the interpersonal level, HCI aided people with TB in safely disclosing their TB status to family members and facilitated family and social support for accountability. The introduction of HIV testing during HCI was reported by some participants as making household members slightly uncomfortable, decreasing interest in household members being tested for TB. HCI negatively impacted community-level TB and HIV-related stigma due to healthcare worker visibility at home. Conclusion Our data suggests varying impacts of HCI on people with TB, their families and interpersonal relationships, and communities, highlighting the importance of considering approaches that address concerns about community stigma and HIV testing to enhance acceptance of HCI. Parent Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov:

Public and Global Health

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper discusses the ethical issues and their impact involved in Household Contact Investigation (HCI) in the context of tuberculosis. The research was conducted in rural and urban areas of South Africa, using qualitative interviews and focus group discussions to understand the effects of HCI on tuberculosis patients, family members, and interpersonal and community levels. Despite being considered an effective strategy for identifying tuberculosis cases and infectees, the study found that HCI may lead to potential negative consequences such as increased stigma, unsafe disease disclosure, and HIV-related discrimination at the community level.

Participants believed that HCI contributes to case detection, educates family members about tuberculosis symptoms, and reduces barriers to health services. However, at the individual level, HCI may result in TB patients disclosing their condition to family members, while increasing minor discomfort in family members undergoing HIV testing. At the community level, the home visits by healthcare workers through HCI may exacerbate stigma associated with tuberculosis and HIV.

The study highlights the need to consider how to address these ethical issues by improving approaches, in order to enhance the acceptance of HCI while mitigating potential harm. The research findings are crucial for ensuring that tuberculosis researchers and planners pay attention to those less obvious benefits and potential harms.