Capturing the implications of residential segregation for the dynamics of infectious disease transmission

Jon Zelner,Danielle Stone,Marisa Eisenberg,Andrew Brouwer,Krzysztof Sakrejda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.26.24309541

2024-06-27

Abstract:Occupational and residential segregation and other manifestations of social and economic inequity drive of racial and socioeconomic inequities in infection, severe disease, and death from a wide variety of infections including SARS-CoV-2, influenza, HIV, tuberculosis, and many others. Despite a deep and long-standing quantitative and qualitative literature on infectious disease inequity, mathematical models that give equally serious attention to the social and biological dynamics underlying infection inequity remain rare. In this paper, we develop a simple transmission model that accounts for the mechanistic relationship between residential segregation on inequity in infection outcomes. We conceptualize segregation as a high-level, fundamental social cause of infection inequity that impacts both who-contacts-whom (separation or preferential mixing) as well as the risk of infection upon exposure (vulnerability). We show that the basic reproduction number, R0, and epidemic dynamics are sensitive to the interaction between these factors. Specifically, our analytical and simulation results and that separation alone is insufficient to explain segregation-associated differences in infection risks, and that increasing separation only results in the concentration of risk in segregated populations when it is accompanied by increasing vulnerability. Overall, this work shows why it is important to carefully consider the causal linkages and correlations between high-level social determinants - like segregation - and more-proximal transmission mechanisms when either crafting or evaluating public health policies. While the framework applied in this analysis is deliberately simple, it lays the groundwork for future, data-driven explorations of the mechanistic impact of residential segregation on infection inequities.

Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to capture the influence mechanism of residential segregation on the inequality of infection outcomes through a simple propagation model. Specifically, the author focuses on how residential segregation affects the inequality of infection through two dimensions: "who contacts whom" (segregation or preferential mixing) and the risk of infection after exposure (vulnerability). The paper emphasizes the sensitivity of the basic reproduction number \( \mathcal{R}_0 \) and epidemic dynamics to the interaction between these factors, and in particular points out that segregation alone is not sufficient to explain the differences in infection - related risks associated with segregation, and only when segregation is accompanied by an increase in vulnerability will it lead to a concentration of risks in the segregated population.

### Main problems and objectives of the paper

1. **Problem background**:
- Factors such as socioeconomic inequality, occupational segregation, and residential segregation have led to inequalities in the infection, severe illness, and mortality rates of various infectious diseases (such as SARS - CoV - 2, influenza, HIV, tuberculosis, etc.) among different ethnic and socioeconomic groups.
- Although there is a rich quantitative and qualitative literature on infectious disease inequalities, there are still few mathematical models that can seriously consider both social and biological dynamics at the same time.

2. **Research objectives**:
- Develop a simple propagation model to mechanically describe the relationship between residential segregation and inequality in infection outcomes.
- Conceptualize segregation as a high - level fundamental social cause that affects not only "who contacts whom" but also the risk of infection after exposure.
- Through analysis and simulation results, show the sensitivity of the basic reproduction number \( \mathcal{R}_0 \) and epidemic dynamics to the interaction between segregation and vulnerability.
- Specifically emphasize that segregation itself is not sufficient to explain the differences in infection - related risks associated with segregation, and only when segregation is accompanied by an increase in vulnerability will it lead to a concentration of risks in the segregated population.

### Main methods

1. **Model construction**:
- Use a propagation model based on the preferential mixing model and define a parameter \( \epsilon \), which represents the proportion of time that an individual randomly mixes with members of other groups other than their own group members.
- Define a parameter \( \rho \), which represents the relative vulnerability of the minority group compared to the majority group, that is, the increased risk of infection for members of the minority group after exposure.

2. **Mathematical derivation**:
- Derive the expression of the basic reproduction number \( \mathcal{R}_0 \) as a function of the key parameters in the model.
- Through numerical and analytical results, understand how different parameter combinations lead to differences in the infection distribution between the minority and majority groups.

3. **Result analysis**:
- Through specific numerical examples and diagrams, show how segregation and vulnerability work together to affect \( \mathcal{R}_0 \) and the infection distribution.
- Emphasize that the interaction between segregation and vulnerability is crucial for understanding the impact of residential segregation on infection inequality.

### Conclusion

This paper reveals, through a simple mathematical model, how residential segregation leads to inequality in infection outcomes by affecting "who contacts whom" and the risk of infection after exposure. The research results show that segregation alone is not sufficient to explain the differences in infection - related risks associated with segregation, and the interaction between segregation and vulnerability must be considered simultaneously. This finding provides a theoretical basis for more in - depth data - driven research in the future and helps to formulate more effective public health policies to reduce the inequality of infectious diseases.