Abstract:Space is continuous. But the communities of researchers that study the cognitive map in non-humans are strangely divided, with debate over its existence found among behaviorists but not neuroscientists. To reconcile this and other debates within the field of navigation, we return to the concept of the parallel map theory, derived from data on hippocampal function in laboratory rodents. Here the cognitive map is redefined as the integrated map, which is a construction of dual mechanisms, one based on directional cues (bearing map) and the other on positional cues (sketch map). We propose that the dual navigational mechanisms of pigeons, the navigational map and the familiar area map, could be homologous to these mammalian parallel maps; this has implications for both research paradigms. Moreover, this has implications for the lab. To create a bearing map (and hence integrated map) from extended cues requires self-movement over a large enough space to sample and model these cues at a high resolution. Thus a navigator must be able to move freely to map extended cues; only then should the weighted hierarchy of available navigation mechanisms shift in favor of the integrated map. Because of the paucity of extended cues in the lab, the flexible solutions allowed by the integrated map should be rare, despite abundant neurophysiological evidence for the existence of the machinery needed to encode and map extended cues through voluntary movement. Not only do animals need to map extended cues but they must also have sufficient information processing capacity. This may require a specific ontogeny, in which the navigator's nervous system is exposed to naturally complex spatial contingencies, a circumstance that occurs rarely, if ever, in the lab. For example, free-ranging, flying animals must process more extended cues than walking animals and for this reason alone, the integrated map strategy may be found more reliably in some species. By taking concepts from ethology and the parallel map theory, we propose a path to directly integrating the three great experimental paradigms of navigation: the honeybee, the homing pigeon and the laboratory rodent, towards the goal of a robust, unified theory of animal navigation.

Neural and sensory basis of homing behavior in the invasive cane toad,

Navigation outside of the box: what the lab can learn from the field and what the field can learn from the lab

Spatial Navigation and the Central Complex: Sensory Acquisition, Orientation, and Motor Control

Homing pigeon navigational ontogeny: no evidence that exposure to a novel release site is sufficient for learning

Long-distance Geomagetic Navigation Based on the Simulation of Animals' Migration

A mechanism of compass-free migratory navigation

The avian olfactory system and hippocampus: Complementary roles in the olfactory and visual guidance of homing pigeon navigation

Simulations to True Animals’ Long-Distance Geomagnetic Navigation

The avian hippocampus and the hypothetical maps used by navigating migratory birds (with some reflection on compasses and migratory restlessness)

Navigation by magnetic signatures in a realistic model of Earth's magnetic field

Cellular networks underlying human spatial navigation

Olfaction and topography, but not magnetic cues, control navigation in a pelagic seabird: displacements with shearwaters in the Mediterranean Sea

Transcriptomic Signature of Spatial Navigation in Brains of Desert Ants

Taking a shortcut: what mechanisms do fish use?

Neurons Including Hippocampal Spatial View Cells, and Navigation in Primates Including Humans

Steering From the Rear: Coordination of Central Pattern Generators Underlying Navigation by Ascending Interneurons

Emergence of Maps in the Memories of Blind Navigation Agents

Varieties of visual navigation in insects

Parahippocampal neurons encode task-relevant information for goal-directed navigation

From fish out of water to new insights on navigation mechanisms in animals

A comparative study of navigation behaviours in ants