Abstract:Open access to data, as a core principle of open science, is predicated on assumptions that scientific data can be reused by other researchers. We test those assumptions by asking where scientists find reusable data, how they reuse those data, and how they interpret data they did not collect themselves. By conducting a qualitative meta-analysis of evidence on two long-term, distributed, interdisciplinary consortia, we found that scientists frequently sought data from public collections and from other researchers for comparative purposes such as "ground-truthing" and calibration. When they sought others' data for reanalysis or for combining with their own data, which was relatively rare, most preferred to collaborate with the data creators. We propose a typology of data reuses ranging from comparative to integrative. Comparative data reuse requires interactional expertise, which involves knowing enough about the data to assess their quality and value for a specific comparison such as calibrating an instrument in a lab experiment. Integrative reuse requires contributory expertise, which involves the ability to perform the action, such as reusing data in a new experiment. Data integration requires more specialized scientific knowledge and deeper levels of epistemic trust in the knowledge products. Metadata, ontologies, and other forms of curation benefit interpretation for any kind of data reuse. Based on these findings, we theorize the data creators' advantage, that those who create data have intimate and tacit knowledge that can be used as barter to form collaborations for mutual advantage. Data reuse is a process that occurs within knowledge infrastructures that evolve over time, encompassing expertise, trust, communities, technologies, policies, resources, and institutions. (See Supplementary Materials for methodological and other details, including a full bibliography.)

A roadmap for fair reuse of public microbiome data

FAIR compliant database development for human microbiome data samples

Challenges and opportunities in sharing microbiome data and analyses

Metadata harmonization-Standards are the key for a better usage of omics data for integrative microbiome analysis

Toward a Framework for Integrative, FAIR, and Reproducible Management of Data on the Dynamic Balance of Microbial Communities

Understanding the provenance and quality of methods is essential for responsible reuse of FAIR data

Reusing Data Technical and Ethical Challenges

Daily life in the Open Biologist's second job, as a Data Curator

Advancing microbiome research through standardized data and metadata collection: introducing the Microbiome Research Data Toolkit

Uses and Reuses of Scientific Data: The Data Creators’ Advantage

Sharing Begins at Home

Data Sharing: Convert Challenges into Opportunities

MicrobioRaman: an open-access web repository for microbiological Raman spectroscopy data

From Data Creator to Data Reuser: Distance Matters

ReUseData: an R/Bioconductor tool for reusable and reproducible genomic data management

A multi-omics data analysis workflow packaged as a FAIR Digital Object

Capturing the workflows of music information retrieval for repeatability and reuse

The Landscape of Data Reuse in Interactive Information Retrieval: Motivations, Sources, and Evaluation of Reusability

Considerations and best practices in animal science 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing microbiome studies

Toward unrestricted use of public genomic data

A roadmap to advance exposomics through federation of data