Local-scale phylodynamics reveal differential community impact of SARS-CoV-2 in a metropolitan US county
Miguel I. Paredes,Amanda C. Perofsky,Lauren Frisbie,Louise H. Moncla,Pavitra Roychoudhury,Hong Xie,Shah A. Mohamed Bakhash,Kevin Kong,Isabel Arnould,Tien V. Nguyen,Seffir T. Wendm,Pooneh Hajian,Sean Ellis,Patrick C. Mathias,Alexander L. Greninger,Lea M. Starita,Chris D. Frazar,Erica Ryke,Weizhi Zhong,Luis Gamboa,Machiko Threlkeld,Jover Lee,Jeremy Stone,Evan McDermot,Melissa Truong,Jay Shendure,Hanna N. Oltean,Cécile Viboud,Helen Chu,Nicola F. Müller,Trevor Bedford
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012117
IF: 7.464
2024-03-27
PLoS Pathogens
Abstract:SARS-CoV-2 transmission is largely driven by heterogeneous dynamics at a local scale, leaving local health departments to design interventions with limited information. We analyzed SARS-CoV-2 genomes sampled between February 2020 and March 2022 jointly with epidemiological and cell phone mobility data to investigate fine scale spatiotemporal SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in King County, Washington, a diverse, metropolitan US county. We applied an approximate structured coalescent approach to model transmission within and between North King County and South King County alongside the rate of outside introductions into the county. Our phylodynamic analyses reveal that following stay-at-home orders, the epidemic trajectories of North and South King County began to diverge. We find that South King County consistently had more reported and estimated cases, COVID-19 hospitalizations, and longer persistence of local viral transmission when compared to North King County, where viral importations from outside drove a larger proportion of new cases. Using mobility and demographic data, we also find that South King County experienced a more modest and less sustained reduction in mobility following stay-at-home orders than North King County, while also bearing more socioeconomic inequities that might contribute to a disproportionate burden of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Overall, our findings suggest a role for local-scale phylodynamics in understanding the heterogeneous transmission landscape. State- or county-level data collected as part of routine surveillance often mask significant local differences in SARS-CoV-2 transmission due to their lack of granularity. This leaves local public health departments with incomplete information for resource allocation. Using King County, Washington as an example of a diverse, metropolitan US county, we leveraged genomic epidemiology to understand differences in transmission between North and South King County, two adjacent regions within the same county with stark socioeconomic differences. By combining epidemiological, mobility, and demographic data, we found that these two regions had divergent SARS-CoV-2 epidemic trajectories following the start of statewide stay-at-home orders in March 2020. Our approach also revealed important differences in the role of viral importations and persistence of local viral transmission on changing SARS-CoV-2 incidence in the background of large-scale non-pharmaceutical interventions. Our work shows that we can use genomic epidemiology to reveal differences in transmission at a local scale, which can inform equitable resource allocation at a local level to reduce the burden of infectious diseases.
microbiology,virology,parasitology