Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Posterior Parietal Cortex Increases Non-target Retrieval during Visual Working Memory

Shengfeng Ye,Menglin Wu,Congyun Yao,Gui Xue,Ying Cai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.17.599451
2024-06-18
Abstract:Accurate visual working memory (VWM) requires precise content-context binding. Previous studies have revealed a close relationship between the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and feature binding during VWM, this study further examined their causal relationship through three transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) experiments. In Experiment 1 (N = 57), participants underwent three sessions of tDCS separately, including PPC stimulation, occipital cortex stimulation, and sham stimulation, and completed a series of delayed estimation tasks for orientations before and after stimulation. Results showed that tDCS over PPC selectively prolonged recall response time (RT) and increased the probability of non-target responses (a.k.a. failure of feature binding). In Experiment 2 (N = 29), combining metacognition estimation during the task, we further investigated whether the effects of PPC stimulation on RT and increased probability of non-target responses were attributed to more mis-binding (i.e., participants self-reported "remembered" in non-target responses) or informed guessing (participants self-reported "forgotten" in non-target responses). We replicated the main findings in Experiment 1, and we also observed greater tDCS effects of PPC on RT in informed guessing trials than mis-binding trials while comparable effects on non-target response rates in these two types of trials. In Experiment 3 (N = 28), we then examined whether the effects of tDCS over PPC specifically influenced the memory retrieval process by using a change detection task. We found that PPC stimulation did not influence the recognition RT or accuracy. Together, this study provides causal evidence supporting the involvement of PPC in feature binding during VWM retrieval.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?