Using a Novel Digital Go/No-Go to Dissociate Intra-subject Temporal Fluctuations in Reaction Time and Accuracy

Theresa M. Nguyen,Mindy K. Ross,Emma Ning,Sarah Kabir,Andrea T. Cladek,Amruta Barve,Ellyn Kennelly,Faraz Hussain,Jennifer Duffecy,Scott L. Langenecker,John Zulueta,Alexander P. Demos,Olusola A. Ajilore,Alex D. Leow
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.12.24308834
2024-06-13
Abstract:Impulsivity can be a risk factor for serious complications for those with mood disorders. To understand intra-individual impulsivity variability, we analyzed longitudinal data of a novel gamified digital Go/No-Go (GNG) task in a clinical sample (n=43 mood disorder participants, n=17 healthy controls) and an open-science sample (n=121, self-reported diagnoses). With repeated measurements within-subject, we disentangled two aspects of GNG: reaction time and accuracy in response inhibition (i.e., incorrect No-Go trials) with respect to diurnal and potential learning effects. Mixed-effects models showed diurnal effects in reaction time but not accuracy, with a significant effect of hour on reaction time in the clinical sample and the open-science sample. Moreover, subjects improved on their response inhibition but not reaction time. Additionally, significant interactions emerged between depression symptom severity and time-of-day in both samples, supporting that repeated administration of our GNG task can yield mood-dependent circadian rhythm-aware biomarkers of neurocognitive function.
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to explore the time - fluctuation patterns of impulsive behaviors within a day in patients with mood disorders. Specifically, by analyzing the longitudinal data of a novel digital "Go/No - Go" task, the researchers attempt to decouple the diurnal fluctuations and potential learning effects of individuals in terms of reaction time and reaction - inhibition accuracy. The research subjects include a clinical sample (43 patients with mood disorders and 17 healthy controls) and an open - science sample (121 self - reported diagnosed participants). ### Main research questions 1. **Time - fluctuations of reaction time and reaction - inhibition accuracy**: - The researchers hope to reveal the variation rules of reaction time and reaction - inhibition accuracy within a day by repeatedly measuring the data of the same subjects. - Specifically, they hope to understand whether these indicators are affected by time - of - day. 2. **Learning effects**: - The researchers also focus on whether the reaction time and reaction - inhibition accuracy of the subjects will improve after completing the task multiple times. - They assume that the reaction time may not improve significantly over time, while the reaction - inhibition accuracy may improve as the number of practice times increases. 3. **Interaction between the severity of depressive symptoms and time - of - day**: - The researchers pay special attention to how the severity of depressive symptoms affects the time - of - day patterns of reaction time and reaction - inhibition accuracy. - They hope to verify whether there are significant differences in the performance of individuals with more severe depressive symptoms at different time periods. ### Research methods - **Samples**: - Clinical sample: 43 patients with mood disorders and 17 healthy controls. - Open - science sample: 121 self - reported diagnosed participants. - **Tasks**: - Use a novel, gamified digital "Go/No - Go" task, which is carried out through a mobile phone application. - The task requires the subjects to shake the mobile phone in the "Go" trials and not to shake the mobile phone in the "No - Go" trials. - **Data analysis**: - Use a mixed - effects model to analyze the reaction time and reaction - inhibition accuracy. - Consider the effects of factors such as time - of - day, age, gender, and the severity of depressive symptoms. ### Main findings 1. **Reaction time**: - The reaction time shows an obvious diurnal fluctuation pattern, being the fastest at noon and slower in the morning and evening. - There is no significant learning effect on the reaction time, that is, the reaction time does not improve significantly after completing the task multiple times. 2. **Reaction - inhibition accuracy**: - There is a significant learning effect on the reaction - inhibition accuracy. The subjects perform better and the error rate decreases after completing the task multiple times. - There is no significant diurnal fluctuation pattern in the reaction - inhibition accuracy. 3. **Interaction between the severity of depressive symptoms and time - of - day**: - Individuals with more severe depressive symptoms perform worse in the morning, while individuals without depressive symptoms perform better in the morning and then gradually decline. - Individuals with a self - reported history of depression generally perform worse, but are not significantly affected by time - of - day. ### Conclusions This study, by analyzing the data of two different samples, reveals the diurnal fluctuation patterns and learning effects of reaction time and reaction - inhibition accuracy in patients with mood disorders. The research results support the use of the digital "Go/No - Go" task to monitor the cognitive functions of patients with mood disorders and provide a new perspective for further exploring the biomarkers of mood disorders.