Multi-objective management of naturally regenerating beech forests: An ecological-economic optimization approach

Markus E. Schorn,Martin F. Quaas,Hanna Schenk,Christian Wirth,Nadja Rueger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.07.597908

2024-06-09

Abstract:How can we meet economic objectives of timber harvesting while maintaining the functioning of diverse forest ecosystems? Existing forest models that address this type of question are often complex, data-intensive, challenging to couple with economic optimization models, or can not easily be generalised for uneven-aged mixed-species forests. Here, we develop an ecological-economic optimization model, which integrates a state-of-the-art demographic forest model with a continuous cover forestry harvesting model to optimise efficient and sustainable timber harvesting. As a proof-of-concept, we apply the model to a beech-dominated forest in the Hainich-Duen region in Thuringia, Germany, with the goal of optimising multiple objectives such as timber yield and the biodiversity value of the forest. The ecological module is the Perfect Plasticity Approximation (PPA) demographic forest model that simulates forest dynamics based on individual tree growth and survival rates in the canopy and understory layers, respectively, as well as recruitment rates. We used repeated forest inventory data from a 28-ha forest plot to quantify these demographic rates and validated the predictions of the ecological module against the structure of old-growth beech forests in Europe. The economic module includes the optimization of net revenues (market revenues net of harvesting cost) from harvesting timber. As an indicator of the biodiversity value of the forest, we use the number of retained habitat trees (>70 cm diameter). The forest model delivered reasonable predictions of structural attributes of unmanaged old-growth beech forests. When net revenues from timber harvest were maximised, trees were logged when they reached 55 cm in diameter. This is similar to current management practices in beech forests. We found a linear trade-off between timber net revenues and biodiversity value with about 2.5% of the maximum benefit of timber harvest being lost with each additionally retained habitat tree. We established a generic ecological-economic modelling framework that reliably represents forest dynamics as well as optimising forest management. To our knowledge, this is the first forest model for central European forests capable of identifying optimal harvesting over the full set of feasible strategies, rather than merely comparing predefined management scenarios. The framework can be extended to mixed-species forests and support forest management for diverse ecosystem services.

Ecology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to maintain the diverse functions of forest ecosystems while achieving economic goals (such as timber harvesting). Specifically, the authors developed an eco - economic optimization model, aiming to optimize multi - objective management in naturally regenerating beech forests, especially the balance between timber production and the value of forest biodiversity. This model integrates advanced forest population dynamics models and continuous - cover forestry harvesting models to achieve efficient and sustainable timber harvesting. By applying this model in beech - dominated forests in the Hainich - Dün region of Thuringia, Germany, researchers hope to find the best management strategy that can both maximize timber profits and retain a certain number of large trees (with a diameter greater than 70 cm) as habitat trees, thereby protecting biodiversity.

### Main Research Questions
1. **How can the diversity of forest ecosystems be maintained while ensuring economic benefits?**
- The research explores how to achieve the dual goals of timber production and biodiversity protection in naturally regenerating beech forests by developing an optimization model that combines ecological and economic factors.

2. **What are the limitations of existing forest models in dealing with complexity and data requirements?**
- The paper points out that existing forest models are often complex and data - intensive, difficult to couple with economic optimization models, and difficult to generalize to mixed forests and forests with uneven age structures. Therefore, a more general and flexible model framework is needed.

3. **How can the trade - off between timber profits and biodiversity protection be quantified and optimized?**
- The research explores the linear trade - off relationship between maximizing timber profits and retaining large habitat trees by simulating forest structures and economic returns under different management strategies, and determines the proportion of timber profit loss caused by each additional retained tree.

### Solutions
- **Model Framework**: The research proposes an eco - economic optimization framework based on the Perfect Plasticity Approximation (PPA) model. The PPA model can simulate the dynamic changes of mixed forests with uneven age structures and takes into account the competitive relationships between the canopy layer and the understory layer.
- **Economic Module**: The model optimizes net income (market income minus harvesting costs) and achieves maximum economic returns by adjusting the harvesting volume of trees of different diameter classes.
- **Biodiversity Indicator**: The research uses the number of retained large trees (with a diameter greater than 70 cm) as an indicator of the value of forest biodiversity.

### Results
- **Model Validation**: The research finds that the model can accurately predict the structural properties of unmanaged old - growth beech forests, including basal area, stem density, and the density of large trees.
- **Management Strategy Optimization**: When only maximizing timber profits is considered, trees are harvested when they reach a diameter of 55 cm, which is similar to current management practices. However, when the constraint of retaining large habitat trees is added, for each additional retained tree, the timber profit will decrease by about 2.5% of the maximum profit.

In conclusion, this research provides a new methodological basis to support management decisions in European beech forests while taking into account both economic and conservation goals.