An evidence-based definition of nutrition security: disparities in sociodemographic characteristics, dietary intake and cardiometabolic risk using the US Healthy Eating Index

Elise Sheinberg,Laura A Schmidt,Jerold R Mande,Euridice Martinez-Steele,Deirdre K Tobias,Cindy W Leung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.04.24308443
2024-06-04
Abstract:Importance: Establishing a universal metric for nutrition security, defined as, ″consistent and equitable access to healthy, safe, affordable foods essential to optimal health and well-being,″ is a national priority. Understanding how the Healthy Eating Index-2020 (HEI-2020) could be used to measure and monitor nutrition security in the population can assist in surveillance and improve the design of nutrition programs and policies. Objective: To examine the utility of the HEI-2020 as an evidence-based measure of nutrition security. Design: This serial cross-sectional study used data from the 2009-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). Setting: Nationally representative, population-based survey Participants: Data for N=22,168 US adults (≥20 years) were analyzed. Main outcome: We derived HEI-2020 scores (0-100), commonly used to capture overall diet quality, from participants′ two 24-hour dietary recalls. Nutrition security categories were established: high nutrition security (>70-100), marginal (>60-70), low (>50-60), and very low (0-50). Results: Only 13% of US adults had high nutrition security while nearly two-thirds had low or very low nutrition security. Nutrition security was higher for adults who were older, female, ″Other″ race or ethnicity, born outside of the US, have higher education attainment, higher income, and food security. Compared to adults with high nutrition security, adults with very low nutrition security had the lowest intakes of unprocessed or minimally processed foods, fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and seafood and the highest intakes of ultra-processed foods, refined grains, and red and processed meats (all P-trends <0.01). Similarly, adults with very low nutrition security were more likely to have elevated adiposity, lower HDL cholesterol, higher triglycerides, higher fasting glucose, and higher hemoglobin A1c (all P-trends ≤0.01). Conclusions: The HEI is a robust measure of nutrition security that can be directly linked to the construct of nutrition security. Using evidence-based HEI cut-points as nutrition security categories would allow policy makers, public health practitioners and nutrition professionals to set benchmarks and nationwide targets for achieving nutrition security.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?