Evolution and paradigm shift in forest health research: A review on global trends and knowledge gaps

Cristina Acosta-Muñoz,Pablo González-Moreno,Francisco Javier Bonet-García,Rafael M. Navarro-Cerrillo,Francisco José Ruiz-Gómez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.03.597256

2024-06-05

Abstract:Forests provide key ecosystem services to human society, and the ability to provide these services depends on their overall health. Forest health is an attractive and interesting concept in forestry research, which environmental, social and political interests have shaped. Assessing forest health is crucial, but finding a single definition of the concept is complex. It is determined by the aim of the forest study, different areas of knowledge, scales of work, technology, methodologies, historical moment or source of funding, among others. With almost a century of scientific evidence, the aim is to identify and contextualise temporal changes in the relevance of this key concept. Trends are analysed through the construction of three main descriptors (state variables, drivers and methods) and the main conceptual subdomains (themes). This review reveals the significant geographical bias in the research, which the Global North predominantly conducts. We observe the evolution of forest health research driven by diverse needs and interests, ranging from air pollution to the multifaceted impacts of climate change. Methodologies applied in this field have also evolved from traditional crown condition inventories to the use of advanced tools such as remote sensing or ecophysiology, improving the characterisation of forest health patterns at both global and individual scales. Forest health research has evolved towards more holistic and multidisciplinary approaches, reflected in the broadening and integration of methodologies and technologies, influenced by historical context, which influence what is being researched today and future scenarios. We identified key knowledge gaps in the scientific literature, in particular the concepts of ecosystem services, Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) and the concept of ‘One Health’. These findings highlight the need for future research to incorporate these critical but often overlooked areas, potentially reshaping future directions and scenarios for forest health research.

Ecology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve mainly focus on the following aspects:

1. **Evolution of the concept of forest health and its background**:
- Forest health is an important concept in forestry research, which is influenced by environmental, social and political interests. Assessing forest health is crucial, but finding a unified definition is very complicated because its definition is affected by multiple factors, such as research purposes, fields of knowledge, working scales, technologies, methods, historical periods or sources of funds, etc.
- The author hopes to identify and explain the changes in the importance of this key concept in different periods by reviewing scientific evidence in the past nearly one century.

2. **Global research trends and knowledge gaps**:
- The paper analyzes and reveals the significant geographical bias in forest health research by constructing three main descriptors (state variables, driving factors and methods) and main conceptual sub - domains (topics), which is mainly dominated by countries in the global North.
- The research shows that the development of forest health research is driven by various influences from air pollution to climate change. The applied methods have also developed from traditional canopy condition surveys to the use of advanced tools, such as remote sensing or ecophysiology, to improve the characterization of forest health patterns.

3. **Advances in methods and technologies**:
- Forest health research has developed in a more comprehensive and interdisciplinary direction, which is reflected in the expansion and integration of methods and technologies. These are influenced by the historical background and also affect current and future research directions.

4. **Identification of key knowledge gaps**:
- The paper points out some key knowledge gaps in scientific literature, especially in aspects such as ecosystem services, essential biodiversity variables (EBVs) and the "One Health" concept. These findings emphasize that future research needs to incorporate these important but often - overlooked areas, which may reshape the direction and scenarios of future forest health research.

In summary, this paper aims to understand the conceptual evolution, global research trends and methodological progress of forest health research through a historical review, identify the knowledge gaps in existing research, and provide guidance for future forest health research.