Group identification drives brain integration for collective performance

Xie Enhui,Shuyi Zha,Yiyang Xu,Xianchun Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.03.597223
2024-06-03
Abstract:Group identification may influence collective behaviors and result in variations in collective performance. However, the evidence for this hypothesis and the neural mechanisms involved remain elusive. To this end, we conducted a study using both single-brain activation and multi-brain synchronization analyses to investigate how group identification influences collective problem-solving in a murder mystery case. Our results showed that groups with high levels of identification performed better individually compared to those with low identification, as supported by single-brain activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Furthermore, high-identification groups also showed enhanced collective performance, supported by within-group neural synchronization (GNS) in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). The DLPFC-OFC connectivity played a crucial role in linking individual and collective performance. Overall, our study provides a two-in-one neural model to explain how group identification affects collective decision-making processes, offering valuable insights into the dynamics of group interactions.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of how group identity influences collective performance and its underlying neural mechanisms. Specifically, the study explores the role of group identity in collective problem-solving tasks through single-brain activation and multi-brain synchronization analysis. The research found that groups with high group identity outperformed those with low group identity at both individual and collective levels. This difference is associated with single-brain activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and group neural synchronization within the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Additionally, the connectivity between DLPFC and OFC plays a crucial role in individual and collective performance. Overall, the study provides a "two-in-one" neural model explaining how group identity influences the collective decision-making process, offering valuable insights into the dynamics of group interactions.