Geometric Study in Binocular Vision of Healthy Human Eye's Misaligned Optical Components

Jacek Turski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.01.595622
2024-06-05
Abstract:The healthy human eye's optical components are misaligned, which has been overlooked in studies of binocular vision. This study presents comprehensive geometric constructions in the binocular system, with the eye model incorporating the fovea that is not located on and the lens that is tilted away from the eye's optical axis. It includes the vertical misalignment of optical components and the 3D binocular field of fixations with the previously considered horizontal misalignment underlying stereopsis. The consequences and functional roles of vertical misalignment are explained in the following finding: The classic Helmholtz theory, which states that the subjective vertical retinal meridian inclination to the retinal horizontal meridian explains the perceived backward tilt of the vertical horopter, is less relevant when the eye's optical components are misaligned. Instead, the lens vertical tilt provides the retinal vertical criterion. The typical misalignment of the fovea and lens in the human population confirms the experimentally measured vertical horopter's inclination.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems Addressed by the Paper This paper aims to address the issue of the misalignment of optical components in healthy human eyes and its impact on binocular vision. Specifically, the authors focus on the positional deviations of the fovea and the lens in the human eye, which are often not aligned with the optical axis of the eye, and the lens is tilted. This misalignment has been overlooked in previous studies on binocular vision. ### Main Research Content 1. **Geometric Modeling**: - The authors propose a comprehensive geometric construction method to describe the misalignment in the binocular system. This model includes the off-axis position of the fovea, the tilt of the lens, and vertical misalignment. - The model also includes horizontal and vertical misalignments, which affect stereopsis. 2. **Challenge to Classical Theories**: - The traditional Helmholtz theory suggests that the tilt of the subjective vertical retinal meridian relative to the horizontal retinal meridian explains the backward tilt of the horopter. However, when considering the misalignment of the eye's optical components, this theory becomes less relevant. - Instead, the vertical tilt of the lens provides the retinal vertical standard. Experimental measurements also confirm this. 3. **Impact of Misalignment**: - Through geometric modeling and dynamic geometric simulations (such as GeoGebra), the authors demonstrate the changes in iso-disparity curves and the subjective vertical horopter under different binocular postures. - The results show that the iso-disparity curves consist of ellipses and hyperbolas, and the zero-disparity horopter closely matches experimental measurements. - The tilt of the vertical horopter in visual perception is consistent with experimental results. 4. **Geometric Conceptualization of Physiological Motivation**: - These results provide new insights into the geometric conceptualization of the physiological motivation for binocular vision, particularly explaining the functional role of vertical misalignment of optical components in healthy human eyes. ### Conclusion Through geometric modeling and experimental validation, the authors demonstrate that the misalignment of optical components in healthy human eyes leads to asymmetry in retinal correspondence, which further affects the changes in iso-disparity curves. These findings provide a new perspective for understanding the geometric mechanisms of binocular vision and challenge the traditional Helmholtz theory.