Emergent Metabolic Niches for Marine Heterotrophs

Ryan Reynolds,Anna CB Weiss,Chase C James,Conner Y Kojima,Jackie Lee Weissman,J. Cameron Thrash,Naomi M Levine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.29.596556
2024-06-02
Abstract:Ocean microbial communities are made up of thousands of diverse taxa whose metabolic demands set the rates of both biomass production and degradation. Thus, these microscopic organisms play a critical role in ecosystem dynamics, global carbon cycling, and climate. While we have frameworks for relating phytoplankton diversity to rates of carbon fixation, our knowledge of how variations in heterotrophic microbial populations drive changes in carbon cycling is in its infancy. Here, we leverage global metagenomic datasets and metabolic models to identify a set of metabolic niches with distinct growth strategies. These groupings provide a simplifying framework for describing microbial communities in different oceanographic regions and for understanding how heterotrophic microbial populations function. This framework, predicated directly on metabolic capability rather than taxonomy, enables us to tractably link heterotrophic diversity directly to biogeochemical rates in large scale ecosystem models.
Ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly discusses the metabolic ecological niche of marine microbial heterotrophs. The study utilizes global metagenomic data and metabolic modeling to identify metabolic ecological niche clusters with different growth strategies, in order to better understand how marine microbial communities affect carbon cycling. Traditionally, marine heterotrophs have been classified into copiotrophic organisms that prefer high-resource environments and oligotrophic organisms that dominate in low-resource environments. However, this approach does not explicitly define metabolic ecological niches or substrate preferences. The researchers constructed a large-scale genome-scale metabolic model for numerous bacteria using automated software such as CarveMe, and evaluated the model's sensitivity to different substrates using flux balance analysis tools. They identified several fast-growing copiotrophic clusters, four slow-growing oligotrophic clusters, and three intermediate-growing clusters, each with unique metabolic strategies. These clusters are distributed globally but vary in abundance in different ecological regions. The paper also highlights limitations of CarveMe in generating high-quality metabolic models, particularly for certain taxonomic groups, which require more reference genomes to improve model quality. By analyzing the sensitivity to different substrate limitations, the researchers defined the metabolic strategies of microorganisms and compared them with experimentally validated data, demonstrating consistency. Using self-organizing map (SOM) clustering method, the researchers identified eight metabolic clusters with different growth rates and substrate preferences. These clusters displayed different biogeographic distribution patterns, for example, fast-growing clusters were more common in eutrophic environments, while slow-growing clusters dominated in oligotrophic regions of the open ocean. In conclusion, this paper aims to address the metabolic diversity of marine microbial heterotrophs, their ecological niches, and how these microorganisms adjust their growth strategies according to environmental conditions. These findings contribute to improving large-scale ecosystem models for more accurate simulation of global carbon cycling and biogeochemical processes.