Embodied decisions as active inference

Matteo Priorelli,Ivilin Peev Stoianov,Giovanni Pezzulo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.28.596181
2024-06-01
Abstract:Decision-making is often conceptualized as a serial process, during which sensory evidence is accumulated for the choice alternatives until a certain threshold is reached, at which point a decision is made and an action is executed. This decide-then-act perspective has successfully explained various facets of perceptual and economic decisions in the laboratory, in which action dynamics are usually irrelevant to the choice. However, living organisms often face another class of decisions - called embodied decisions - that require selecting between potential courses of actions to be executed timely in a dynamic environment, e.g., for a lion, deciding which gazelle to chase and how fast to do so. Studies of embodied decisions reveal two aspects of goal-directed behavior in stark contrast to the serial view. First, that decision and action processes can unfold in parallel; second, that action-related components, such as the motor costs associated with the choice alternatives and required to "change mind'' between them, exert a feedback effect on the decision taken. Here, we show that these signatures of embodied decisions emerge naturally in active inference - a framework that simultaneously optimizes perception and action, according to the same (free energy minimization) imperative. We show that optimizing embodied choices requires a continuous feedback loop between motor planning (where beliefs about choice alternatives guide action dynamics) and motor inference (where action dynamics finesse beliefs about choice alternatives). Furthermore, our active inference simulations reveal the normative character of embodied decisions in ecological settings - namely, achieving an effective balance between a high accuracy and a low risk of losing valid opportunities.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is the inadequacy of traditional decision models in handling "embodied decisions." Specifically, traditional decision models typically view the decision-making process as a serial process, where sensory evidence is accumulated until a certain threshold is reached, and then a decision is made and an action is executed. However, in dynamic environments, the decisions that organisms face often require selecting and immediately executing actions under time pressure, such as a lion deciding which gazelle to chase and how to act quickly. These types of decisions are referred to as "embodied decisions," characterized by the parallel unfolding of decision and action processes, and the feedback influence of action-related factors (such as movement costs) on the decision-making process. The main goal of the paper is to demonstrate how the characteristics of these embodied decisions naturally emerge within the "active inference" framework. Active inference is a framework that simultaneously optimizes perception and action by minimizing free energy. The paper uses simulation experiments to show how the active inference model can reproduce various empirical findings in embodied decision-making, including the parallel unfolding of actions and decisions and the impact of movement dynamics on perception. Additionally, the paper explores the normative advantages of embodied decision-making under time pressure, achieving an effective balance between high accuracy and low risk.