Utilizing tACS to enhance memory confidence and EEG to predict individual differences in brain stimulation efficacy

Syanah C Wynn,Tom R Marshall,Erika Nyhus
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.27.596015
2024-06-01
Abstract:The information transfer necessary for successful memory retrieval is believed to be mediated by theta and gamma oscillations. These oscillations have been linked to memory processes in electrophysiological studies, which were correlational in nature. In the current study, we used transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to externally modulate brain oscillations to examine its direct effects on memory performance. Participants received sham, theta (4 Hz), and gamma (50 Hz) tACS over frontoparietal regions while retrieving information in a source memory paradigm. Linear regression models were used to investigate the direct effects of oscillatory non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on memory accuracy and confidence. Our results indicate that both theta and gamma tACS altered memory confidence. Specifically, theta tACS seemed to lower the threshold for confidence in retrieved information, while gamma tACS appeared to alter the memory confidence bias. Furthermore, the individual differences in tACS effects could be predicted from electroencephalogram (EEG) measures recorded prior to stimulation, suggesting that EEG could be a useful tool for predicting individual variability in the efficacy of NIBS.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper discusses how to enhance memory confidence using transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) and predicts individual differences in the effects of brain stimulation through EEG. In the study, participants received sham stimulation, 4 Hz (theta-frequency band) tACS, and 50 Hz (gamma-frequency band) tACS while performing a source memory task. A linear regression model was used to investigate the effects of different frequencies of non-invasive brain stimulation on memory accuracy and confidence. The results indicated that both theta and gamma tACS altered memory confidence. Theta tACS appeared to lower the threshold for information retrieval, while gamma tACS influenced the bias of memory confidence. Additionally, the study found that pre-experimental EEG measurements could predict individual differences in the effects of tACS stimulation, suggesting that EEG may be a useful tool for predicting individual differences in non-invasive brain stimulation. The paper introduced the relationship between memory and theta and gamma oscillations, which are believed to play important roles in the memory process. tACS was used to modulate these oscillations to directly impact memory performance. Previous research has shown that theta tACS aids in memory encoding, while theta otDCS improves associative memory. However, research on gamma tACS is limited, and its role in memory is still unclear. The methods section provides detailed descriptions of participant selection, stimulation parameters, stimulation materials, tACS parameters, and the experimental procedure. EEG was recorded throughout the experiment for analysis and prediction of individual differences. The research goal is to improve the accuracy and confidence of source memory by enhancing communication between the DLPFC and PPC, indirectly influencing core areas of memory networks such as the hippocampus. In summary, this paper aims to enhance memory performance, particularly confidence, using tACS, and explore the potential of EEG in predicting the effects of brain stimulation.