Abstract:Abstract Cell signal networks are orchestrated directly or indirectly by various peptide-mediated protein–protein interactions, which are normally weak and transient and thus ideal for biological regulation and medicinal intervention. Here, we develop a general-purpose method for modeling and predicting the binding affinities of protein–peptide interactions (PpIs) at the structural level. The method is a hybrid strategy that employs an unsupervised approach to derive a layered PpI atom–residue interaction (ulPpI[a-r]) potential between different protein atom types and peptide residue types from thousands of solved PpI complex structures and then statistically correlates the potential descriptors with experimental affinities (KD values) over hundreds of known PpI samples in a supervised manner to create an integrated unsupervised–supervised PpI affinity (usPpIA) predictor. Although both the ulPpI[a-r] potential and usPpIA predictor can be used to calculate PpI affinities from their complex structures, the latter seems to perform much better than the former, suggesting that the unsupervised potential can be improved substantially with a further correction by supervised statistical learning. We examine the robustness and fault-tolerance of usPpIA predictor when applied to treat the coarse-grained PpI complex structures modeled computationally by sophisticated peptide docking and dynamics simulation. It is revealed that, despite developed solely based on solved structures, the integrated unsupervised–supervised method is also applicable for locally docked structures to reach a quantitative prediction but can only give a qualitative prediction on globally docked structures. The dynamics refinement seems not to change (or improve) the predictive results essentially, although it is computationally expensive and time-consuming relative to peptide docking. We also perform extrapolation of usPpIA predictor to the indirect affinity quantities of HLA-A*0201 binding epitope peptides and NHERF PDZ binding scaffold peptides, consequently resulting in a good and moderate correlation of the predicted KD with experimental IC50 and BLU on the two peptide sets, with Pearson’s correlation coefficients Rp = 0.635 and 0.406, respectively.

Interpretable Protein-DNA Interactions Captured by Structure-Sequence Optimization

An All‐atom Knowledge‐based Energy Function for Protein‐dna Threading, Docking Decoy Discrimination, and Prediction of Transcription‐factor Binding Profiles

Deciphering the Language of Protein-DNA Interactions: A Deep Learning Approach Combining Contextual Embeddings and Multi-Scale Sequence Modeling

A High-Throughput Percentage-of-binding Strategy to Measure Binding Energies in DNA-protein Interactions: Application to Genome-Scale Site Discovery.

Quantitative Evaluation of Protein-Dna Interactions Using an Optimized Knowledge-Based Potential.

Exploring Protein-DNA Binding Residue Prediction and Consistent Interpretability Analysis Using Deep Learning

An Overview of the Prediction of Protein DNA-Binding Sites

Modeling protein-peptide recognition based on classical quantitative structure-affinity relationship approach: implication for proteome-wide inference of peptide-mediated interactions

Optimizing Scoring Function of Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions with Both Affinity and Specificity

Structural predictions of protein–DNA binding: MELD-DNA

Genome-wide prediction of minor-groove electrostatic potential enables biophysical modeling of protein–DNA binding

Advancing Protein-DNA Binding Site Prediction: Integrating Sequence Models and Machine Learning Classifiers

Protein-DNA complex structure modeling based on structural template

emPDBA: protein-DNA binding affinity prediction by combining features from binding partners and interface learned with ensemble regression model

Structure-Based Prediction Of Dna-Binding Proteins By Structural Alignment And A Volume-Fraction Corrected Dfire-Based Energy Function

Predicting DNA-binding Proteins and Binding Residues by Complex Structure Prediction and Application to Human Proteome.

Integrated unsupervised–supervised modeling and prediction of protein–peptide affinities at structural level

Predicting Transcription Factor Specificity with All-Atom Models

Identification of DNA–protein Binding Sites Through Multi-Scale Local Average Blocks on Sequence Information

Kinetics of protein-DNA interaction: facilitated target location in sequence-dependent potential

Computational methods for DNA-binding protein and binding residue prediction.