Hospital Variability in the Use of Vasoactive Agents in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Clinical Phenotypes and Therapeutic Approaches

Yasuyuki Shiraishi,Nozomi Niimi,Shun Kohsaka,Kazumasa Harada,Takashi Kohno,Makoto Takei,Takahiro Jimba,Hiroki Nakano,Junya Matsuda,Akito Shindo,Daisuke Kitano,Shigeto Tsukamoto,Shinji Koba,Takeshi Yamamoto,Morimasa Takayama
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.24.24307917
2024-05-27
Abstract:Background: The absence of practice standards in vasoactive agent usage for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) has resulted in significant treatment variability across hospitals, potentially affecting patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess temporal trends and institutional differences in vasodilator and inotrope/vasopressor utilization among ADHF patients, considering their clinical phenotypes. Methods: Data were extracted from a government-funded multicenter registry covering the Tokyo metropolitan area, comprising 44,444 consecutive patients urgently hospitalized in intensive/cardiovascular care units with a primary diagnosis of ADHF between 2013 and 2021. Clinical phenotypes, i.e., pulmonary congestion or tissue hypoperfusion, were defined through a comprehensive assessment of clinical signs and symptoms, vital signs, and laboratory findings. We assessed the frequency and temporal trends in phenotype-based drug utilization of vasoactive agents and investigated institutional characteristics associated with adopting the phenotype-based approach. Results: Throughout the study period, both overall and phenotype-based vasodilator utilization showed significant declines, with overall usage dropping from 61.4% in 2013 to 48.6% in 2021 (p for trend < 0.001). Conversely, no temporal changes were observed in overall inotrope/vasopressor utilization from 24.6% in 2013 to 25.8% in 2021 or the proportion of phenotype-based utilization. Notably, there was considerable variability in phenotype-based drug utilization among hospitals, ranging from 0% to 100%. Particularly, hospitals with a large number of board-certified cardiologists demonstrated reduced phenotype-based vasodilator utilization and phenotypically inappropriate inotrope/vasopressor utilization over time. Conclusions: Substantial variability existed among hospitals in phenotype-based drug utilization of vasoactive agents for ADHF patients, highlighting the need for standardization in their adoption during hospitalization.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?