Improving The Care of Critically Ill Patients: Lessons Learned from The Promotion of Essential Emergency and Critical Care In Tanzania: A Qualitative Study.

Aneth Charles Kaliza,Linda B. Mlunde,Carl Otto Schell,Karima Khalid,Hendry Sawe,Elibariki Mkumbo,Andrew Kigombola,Isihaka Mwandalima,Erasto Sylvanus,Said Kilindimo,Edwin Lugazia,Janeth Stanslaus Masuma,Tim Baker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.24.24307887
2024-05-24
Abstract:Objective: To describe the lessons learned during the promotion of a new approach to the care of critically ill patients - Essential Emergency and Critical Care (EECC) - in Tanzania Design: A descriptive qualitative study using thematic analysis of structured interviews Setting and Participants: The study was conducted in Dar es Salaam and Dodoma regions in Tanzania, involving eleven policy makers, researchers and senior clinicians who participated in the promotion of EECC in the country. Results: The five lessons that emerged from the promotion of EECC in Tanzania were: (i) ensure early and close collaboration with the government and stakeholders; (ii) conduct research and utilize evidence; (iii) prioritize advocacy and address misconceptions about EECC; (iv) leverage events and embed activities in other health system interventions and (v) employ a multifaceted implementation strategy. Conclusion: The results from this study show the efficacy of a holistic, comprehensive approach in promoting EECC as each strategy reinforces the others. This approach led the to the successful promotion of EECC and the development by the government of Tanzania of a National Strategic Plan for EECC. Article Summary Strengths and Limitations of this study: Strengths: - High Credibility of Findings due to the in-depth data collection process, which continued until data saturation was reached. - Mitigation of Personal Biases by sharing findings with participants at various stages of manuscript writing. - Diverse Perspectives from the professional diversity of participants enriched the findings. Weaknesses: - Lack of Translation and Transcription; instead, a codebook and audio recordings were used for cross-referencing. - The purposeful selection of participants may have resulted in a sample that is homogeneous in their perspectives on EECC, limiting the diversity of viewpoints and experiences that could be explored.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?