Postoperative Surveillance Adherence in Colorectal Cancer Patients at Urban Medical Center: is it Adequate?

Ahmad Alnasarat,Talin Darian,Awni Shahait,Mohanad Baldawi,Gamal Mostafa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.23.24307790

2024-05-23

Abstract:Aim To examine the adherence rate to surveillance guidelines after curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and the impact of demographic factors. Methods Data was collected retrospectively including demographics, stage at diagnosis, and adherence to surveillance guidelines as recommended by the US Multi-Society Task Force (USMSTF) guidelines, for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who underwent curative surgical resection between 2005 and 2014 in a tertiary academic medical center. Results A total of 124 patients were included (Male /female, 56.5%/ 43.5%), African American 109 (87.9%), and 70 patients (56.5%) had Medicare/Medicaid insurance. Overall, Appropriate clinical evaluation twice per year for 3 years following surgery was completed in 78 (63%) of patients. A total of 56 (45%) had carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels checked twice a year for 3 years. Surveillance colonoscopy 1 year postoperatively occurred in 64 (51.6%), and 37 (29.8%) had a second colonoscopy 3 years postoperatively. Abdomen/pelvis CT scan was obtained in 90 (72.5%) at 1 year post-operatively. In the entire cohort, strict adherence to post-recession surveillance only occurred in 46 (37.1%). There was no correlation between adherence to surveillance and gender (p=0.184), race (p=0.118), or insurance type (p=0.51). Conclusion Adherence to surveillance after curative resection of CRC was inadequate regardless of socioeconomic, medical insurance, or race. Measures should be taken to identify barriers and improve compliance with guidelines.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore the problem of postoperative follow - up compliance rate among colorectal cancer patients in urban tertiary medical centers, and evaluate the influence of demographic factors (such as gender, race, and insurance type) on the compliance rate. Specifically, the researchers hope to evaluate whether these patients follow the postoperative follow - up guidelines recommended by the United States Multi - Society Task Force (USMSTF) by retrospectively analyzing the follow - up data of colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery in two urban teaching hospitals between 2005 and 2014. The main objective of the study is to understand the compliance of patients with regular clinical evaluation, CEA level monitoring, CT scanning, and colonoscopy within three years after surgery, and analyze the influence of different demographic characteristics on the compliance rate. The study found that, overall, only 37.1% of patients strictly followed the USMSTF follow - up guidelines, and this low compliance rate was not related to gender, race, or insurance type. This finding challenges the previous hypothesis that demographic differences affect the postoperative follow - up compliance rate. Therefore, the study emphasizes the need to take measures to identify barriers and improve patients' compliance with the follow - up guidelines.

Postoperative Surveillance Adherence in Colorectal Cancer Patients at Urban Medical Center: is it Adequate?

Association Between Patient-Level, Clinic-Level, and Geographical-Level Factors and 1-Year Surveillance Colonoscopy Adherence

Adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis

S476 Adherence to Surveillance Colonoscopy and Associated Factors: A Systematic Review

O156: Post-operative surveillance following curative resection of colorectal cancer in an elderly population

Post-polypectomy Guideline Adherence: Importance of Belief in Guidelines, Not Guideline Knowledge or Fear of Missed Cancer

S368 Rates of Guideline-Directed, Post-Treatment Surveillance Colonoscopy in Early- and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer Patients

Clinician perceptions on barriers and facilitators to 1‐year surveillance colonoscopy completion in survivors of colorectal cancer

Challenges of Surveillance in Implementing Nonoperative Management for Rectal Cancer

Post-polypectomy follow-up recommendations by practicing academic gastroenterologists—does number of years in practice matter?

Heterogeneity in colorectal cancer incidence among people recommended 3-yearly surveillance post-polypectomy: a validation study

Cancer Biology or Ineffective Surveillance? A Multicentre Retrospective Analysis of Colitis-Associated Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancers

Colonoscopy surveillance in colorectal cancer after surgery

Post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy: are we following the guidelines?

Colorectal cancer risk following polypectomy in a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study: an evaluation of the 2020 UK post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines

Colonoscopy quality measures and adherence to follow-up guidelines among endoscopists participating in a U.S. endoscopy registry

Adherence to Colonoscopy in Cascade Screening of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

A Global View of Adherence to Colonoscopy Follow-Up in Cascade Screening of Colorectal Cancer.

A survey of current practices in post-polypectomy surveillance in Korea

Colorectal cancer screening uptake and adherence by modality at a large tertiary care center in the United States: a retrospective analysis

Randomized trial of patient outreach approaches to de-implement outdated colonoscopy surveillance intervals.