Rory Gibb,Sadie J. Ryan,David Pigott,Maria del Pilar Fernandez,Renata L. Muylaert,Gregory F. Albery,Daniel J. Becker,Jason K. Blackburn,Hernan Caceres-Escobar,Michael Celone,Evan A. Eskew,Hannah K. Frank,Barbara A. Han,Erin N Hulland,Kate E. Jones,Rebecca Katz,Adam J Kucharski,Direk J Limmathurotsakul,Catherine A. Lippi,Joshua Longbottom,Juan Fernando Martinez,Jane P. Messina,Elaine O. Nsoesie,David W. Redding,Daniel Romero-Alvarez,Boris V. Schmid,Stephanie N. Seifert,Anabel Sinchi,Christopher H. Trisos,Michelle Wille,Colin J. Carlson

Abstract:Emerging infectious diseases are increasingly understood as a hallmark of the Anthropocene. Most experts agree that anthropogenic ecosystem change and high-risk contact among people, livestock, and wildlife have contributed to the recent emergence of new zoonotic, vector-borne, and environmentally-transmitted pathogens. However, the extent to which these factors also structure landscapes of human infection and outbreak risk is not well understood, beyond certain well-studied disease systems. Here, we consolidate 58,319 unique records of outbreak events for 32 emerging infectious diseases worldwide, and systematically test the influence of 16 hypothesized social and environmental drivers on the geography of outbreak risk, while adjusting for multiple detection, reporting, and research biases. Across diseases, outbreak risks are widely associated with mosaic landscapes where people live alongside forests and fragmented ecosystems, and are commonly exacerbated by long-term decreases in precipitation. The combined effects of these drivers are particularly strong for vector-borne diseases (e.g., Lyme disease and dengue fever), underscoring that policy strategies to manage these emerging risks will need to address land use and climate change. In contrast, we find little evidence that spillovers of directly-transmitted zoonotic diseases (e.g., Ebola virus disease and mpox) are consistently associated with these factors, or with other anthropogenic drivers such as deforestation and agricultural intensification. Most importantly, we find that observed spatial outbreak intensity is primarily an artefact of the geography of healthcare access, indicating that existing disease surveillance systems remain insufficient for comprehensive monitoring and response: across diseases, outbreak reporting declined by a median of 32% (range 1.2%-96.7%) for each additional hour's travel time from the nearest health facility. Our findings underscore that disease emergence is a multicausal feature of social-ecological systems, and that no one-size-fits-all global strategy can prevent epidemics and pandemics. Instead, ecosystem-based interventions should follow regional priorities and system-specific evidence, and be paired with investment in One Health surveillance and health system strengthening.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the geographical distribution of the outbreak risks of emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) and the underlying social and environmental driving factors. Specifically, the researchers integrated 58,319 unique outbreak event records of 32 emerging infectious diseases globally and systematically tested the effects of 16 hypothesized social and environmental driving factors on the geographical distribution of the outbreak risks of these diseases, while adjusting for detection, reporting, and research biases. The main objectives of the study include: 1. **Identifying the general human fingerprint**: The study attempts to distinguish the general impact of human activities on the spatial intensity of emerging infectious disease outbreaks from biases and noise. 2. **Exploring environmental change categories for different pathogen types, transmission modes, and regions**: The study hopes to determine which broad environmental change categories are consistently associated with disease outbreak events among different types of pathogens and in different geographical regions. 3. **Searching for widely - shared driving factors**: The study aims to find widely - shared driving factors across diseases and transmission modes, which may point to promising ecosystem - based intervention strategies. Through this study, the authors hope to provide a deeper understanding of how to prevent and control the outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases through ecological and socio - economic interventions, especially emphasizing the importance of ecosystem protection, climate change mitigation, and strengthening "One Health" monitoring and health systems.

The anthropogenic fingerprint on emerging infectious diseases