Structural characterization and AlphaFold modeling of human T cell receptor recognition of NRAS cancer neoantigens

Daichao Wu,Rui Yin,Guodong Chen,Helder V Ribeiro-Filho,Melyssa Cheung,Paul F Robbins,Roy A Mariuzza,Brian G Pierce
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.21.595215
2024-05-23
Abstract:T cell receptors (TCRs) that recognize cancer neoantigens are important for anti-cancer immune responses and immunotherapy. Understanding the structural basis of TCR recognition of neoantigens provides insights into their exquisite specificity and can enable design of optimized TCRs. We determined crystal structures of a human TCR in complex with NRAS Q61K and Q61R neoantigen peptides and HLA-A1 MHC, revealing the molecular underpinnings for dual recognition and specificity versus wild-type NRAS peptide. We then used multiple versions of AlphaFold to model the corresponding complex structures, given the challenge of immune recognition for such methods. Interestingly, one implementation of AlphaFold2 (TCRmodel2) was able to generate accurate models of the complexes, while AlphaFold3 also showed strong performance, although success was lower for other complexes. This study provides insights into TCR recognition of a shared cancer neoantigen, as well as the utility and practical considerations for using AlphaFold to model TCR-peptide-MHC complexes.
Immunology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly discusses how T-cell receptors (TCRs) recognize NRAS cancer neoantigens, specifically NRAS Q61K and Q61R mutations. These neoantigens are generated by gene mutations in tumor cells and are crucial for immune response and immunotherapy. The study revealed the molecular basis of TCR interaction with NRAS neoantigen peptides and HLA-A1 complexes through crystal structure analysis, which helps understand the specificity and dual recognition mechanism of TCR. The paper mentions that TCR N17.1.2 can recognize NRAS Q61K and Q61R mutations but does not recognize wild-type NRAS peptides. The affinity of TCR with mutant peptides was confirmed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) experiments. In addition, the researchers used the AlphaFold method to simulate the complex structures of TCR and these antigens. It was found that a version of AlphaFold2 (TCRmodel2) can generate accurate models, and AlphaFold3 also performed well, but with lower success rates for some other complexes. The study also points out that TCR N17.1.2 primarily interacts with the C-terminus of the peptide through its β chain when recognizing NRAS neoantigens, particularly through the salt bridge formed by CDR3b loop and the Lys/Arg mutation site P7, which is crucial for its high specificity. Additionally, the researchers found that although AlphaFold exhibited excellent performance in predicting TCR-pMHC complex structures, increased sampling is needed in some cases to improve model accuracy. Overall, this paper provides a structural basis for understanding how TCR differentiates between wild-type and mutant NRAS and evaluates the potential and limitations of AlphaFold in predicting such complex structures, which has guiding significance for future design and optimization of TCR and immunotherapy.