Assessing the impact of Enhanced-Case-Finding on tuberculosis incidence and transmission in The Gambia using epidemiological and phylodynamic approaches

Florian Gehre,Francis Oko,Boatema Ofori-Anyinam,Conor J Meehan,Etthel M Windels,Ken Joof,Tutty Faal,Francis Mendy,Tijan Jobarteh,Ensa Gitteh,Abi Janet Riley,Binta Sarr-Kuyateh,Catherine Okoi,Edward Demba,William Del-Alorse,Kodjovi Mlaga,Basil Sambou,Fatoumatta Kanuteh,Koduh Lette,Abdul Khalie Muhammad,Shadrac Agbla,Wim Mulders,Simon Donkor,David Jeffries,Anna Roca,Umberto DAlessandro,Martin Antonio,Ifedayo Adetifa,Bouke C de Jong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.17.24307536
2024-05-17
Abstract:Background: Most tuberculosis (TB) cases in The Gambia are notified in the Greater Banjul Area (GBA). We conducted an Enhanced-Case-Finding (ECF) intervention in the GBA and determined its effect on TB incidence and ongoing TB transmission. Methods: This was a cluster randomized trial in which randomly assigned intervention areas of grouped settlements received three rounds of an ECF strategy consisting of sensitization followed by auramine microscopy, whereas TB patients in control areas continued to be identified through passive case finding. The primary outcome was TB incidence rate. To exclude that an increase in notified cases, followed by a decrease in notified cases, would hide the future impact of the intervention, we tested for changes in transmission dynamics using both genetic clustering and phylodynamic methods. Results: No significant difference in TB incidence rates, transmission clustering or effective reproductive number was detected between intervention and control areas. Conclusion: Although we did not find evidence for decreased TB incidence nor TB transmission through the ECF strategy used, this approach is an examplar of how both classical epidemiology and genomic phylodynamics approaches can be integrated to better assess public health intervention outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?