Network-based biomarkers in background electroencephalography in childhood epilepsies - A scoping review and narrative synthesis

Kay Meiklejohn,Leandro Junges,John Terry,Alison Whight,Rohit Shankar,Wessel Woldman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.17.24307531
2024-05-17
Abstract:Background: Brain network analysis is an emerging field of research that could lead to the development, testing and validation of novel biomarkers for epilepsy. This could shorten the diagnostic uncertainty period, improve treatment, decrease seizure risk and lead to better management. This scoping review summarises the current state of electroencephalogram (EEG)- based network abnormalities for childhood epilepsies. The review assesses the overall robustness, potential generalizability, strengths, and limitations of the methodological frameworks of the identified research studies. Methods: PRISMA guidelines for Scoping Reviews and the PICO framework was used to guide this review. Studies that evaluated candidate network-based features from EEG in children were retrieved from four international indexing databases (Cochrane Central / Embase / Medline / PsycINFO). Each selected study design, intervention characteristics, methodological design, potential limitations, and key findings were analysed. Results: Of 2,959 studies retrieved nine were included. Studies used a group-level based comparison (e.g. based on a statistical test) or a classification-based method (e.g. based on a statistical model, such as a decision tree). A common limitation was the small sample-sizes (limiting further subgroup or confounder analysis) and the overall heterogeneity in epilepsy syndromes and age groups. Conclusion: The heterogeneity of included studies (e.g. study design, statistical framework, outcome metrics) highlights the need for future studies to adhere to standardized frameworks (e.g. STARD) in order to develop standardized and robust methodologies. This would enable rigorous comparisons between studies, which is critical in assessing the potential of network-based approaches in developing novel biomarkers for childhood epilepsies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the research status of electroencephalogram (EEG) - based network markers in childhood epilepsy and their potential application value. Specifically, the research aims to: 1. **Identify candidate network markers**: Analyze the clinical background electroencephalogram (EEG) of children with epilepsy in the awake state to identify network features that may serve as biomarkers. 2. **Evaluate the robustness and universality of research methods**: Conduct a comprehensive evaluation of existing research and analyze the advantages and limitations of its methodological framework. 3. **Explore differences between different age groups and epilepsy classifications**: Pay special attention to children in three age groups: 2 - 5 years old, 5 - 10 years old, and 10 - 18 years old, and explore the differences in network markers between different types of epilepsy and the control group. ### Research Background Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological diseases in children, affecting more than 60,000 children in the UK. Early diagnosis and intervention can improve the control of epileptic seizures and prevent the deterioration of cognitive function. However, the diagnosis process of epilepsy is usually complex and time - consuming. At present, it mainly relies on electroencephalogram (EEG) for diagnosis, but it is difficult to make a definite diagnosis in the absence of seizures or other visible abnormalities. In addition, the evaluation of the effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs (ASMs) also mainly depends on the daily observations of parents and caregivers, lacking objective biomarker support. ### Research Objectives This article summarizes the current research status of EEG - based network abnormalities in childhood epilepsy by means of review and narrative synthesis. The research aims to: - Identify network concepts applicable to children of different age groups. - Explore the differences in network markers between different types of epilepsy and the control group. - Evaluate the robustness and universality of existing research methods and provide guidance for future research. ### Methods The research adopted the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO framework to guide literature retrieval and screening. Relevant literatures were retrieved from four international databases (Cochrane Central, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO), and finally 9 eligible studies were determined through multiple rounds of screening. ### Results - **Number of studies**: A total of 2,959 literatures were retrieved, and finally 9 were included. - **Research methods**: Most studies used inter - group comparison (such as statistical tests) or classification methods (such as decision trees) to analyze network markers. - **Limitations**: The small sample size limits further subgroup analysis; the heterogeneity of research subjects is high, including different epilepsy syndromes and age groups. ### Conclusions Existing research has great heterogeneity in design, statistical framework, and outcome indicators, which highlights the importance of following a standardized framework (such as STARD) in future research. This will help develop standardized and robust methods, thereby enabling more rigorous comparison of different studies and evaluating the potential of network - based methods in developing new biomarkers for childhood epilepsy.