The immune cell dynamics in the peripheral blood of cHL patients receiving anti-PD1 treatment

Vanessa Cristaldi,Lodovico Terzi di Bergamo,Lucrezia Patruno,Marinos Kallikourdis,Giada Andrea Cassanmagnago,Francesco Corrado,Eleonora Calabretta,Adalgisa Condoluci,Martina di Trani,Daoud Rahal,Gianluca Basso,Clelia Peano,Alex Graudenzi,Marco Antoniotti,Davide Rossi,Carmelo Carlo-Stella
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.15.24307370
2024-05-16
Abstract:Checkpoint blockade therapy (CBT) involving anti-PD1 antibodies represents the standard approach for cHL patients who do not respond to second-line therapy. Nonetheless, only 20% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) cHL patients treated with CBT achieve complete remission. In this study, we extensively examined the immune dynamics in eight R/R cHL patients treated with CBT, consisting of four complete responders (CR) and four experiencing disease progression (PD), by single cell analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Our unique approach encompassed longitudinal analysis with three time points, providing a comprehensive understanding of the evolving immune responses during anti-PD1 therapy. Through gene expression profiling, we identified a stable and distinctive KLRG1+/FOS+/JUN+/GZMA+/CD8+ T cell phenotype in patients achieving complete responses. This specific CD8+ T cell subset exhibited sustained activation, underscoring its potential pivotal role in mounting an effective immune response against cHL. Furthermore, T cell receptor (TCR) analysis revealed that in responder patients there is clonal expansion between TCR clonotypes specifically in the KLRG1+/FOS+/JUN+/GZMA+/CD8+ T cell subset. Our longitudinal study offers unique insights into the complex immune dynamics of multiply relapsed/highly pre-treated cHL patients undergoing anti-PD1 therapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the immunodynamics of immune cells in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) undergoing anti-PD1 immune checkpoint blockade therapy (Checkpoint Blockade Therapy, CBT). The study particularly focuses on relapsed/refractory (R/R) cHL patients and attempts to identify biomarkers that can predict treatment response. ### Research Background and Objectives - **Background**: Although anti-PD1 antibodies have become the standardized chemotherapy regimen for cHL patients unresponsive to second-line treatments, only about 20% of R/R cHL patients achieve complete remission after using CBT. - **Objectives**: To deeply investigate the dynamic changes of immune cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of R/R cHL patients during CBT using single-cell analysis techniques, aiming to discover biomarkers that can predict treatment efficacy. ### Main Findings 1. **Unique CD8+ T Cell Phenotype**: Researchers identified a stable and unique KLRG1+/FOS+/JUN+/GZMA+/CD8+ T cell subset in patients who achieved complete remission. These cells exhibited a sustained activation state and might play a key role in effective immune responses against cHL. 2. **TCR Clonal Expansion**: Specific clonal expansion of T cell receptors (TCR) was observed within the KLRG1+/FOS+/JUN+/GZMA+/CD8+ T cell subset in patients responding to treatment, suggesting that these specific T cell subsets might be associated with treatment response. 3. **Immunodynamic Changes**: Longitudinal analysis showed that in patients responding to treatment, certain types of lymphocytes such as naive CD4+ T cells, CD4+ central memory cells, CD8+ T cells, γδ T cells, and B cells increased at various stages of treatment, whereas non-responding patients exhibited the opposite trend. ### Conclusion This paper reveals, through single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and single-cell TCR sequencing (scTCR-seq) techniques, how changes in the peripheral blood T cell pool of R/R cHL patients can serve as potential biomarkers for predicting anti-PD1 treatment response. In particular, the changes in the KLRG1+/FOS+/JUN+/GZMA+/CD8+ T cell subset and their TCR clonotypes may become important indicators for assessing patient treatment prospects. These findings help us better understand the different response mechanisms of cHL patients to immunotherapy and provide important clues for developing more personalized treatment strategies in the future.