The Neosartorya (Aspergillus) fischeri antifungal protein NFAP2 has low potential to trigger resistance development in Candida albicans in vitro

Gabor Bende,Nora Zsindely,Krisztian Laczi,Zsolt Kristoffy,Csaba Papp,Attila Farkas,Liliana Toth,Szabolcs Saringer,Laszlo Bodai,Gabor Rakhely,Florentine Marx,Laszlo Galgoczy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.14.594093
2024-05-14
Abstract:Due to the increase in the number of drug-resistant Candida albicans strains, new antifungal compounds with limited potential for development of resistance are urgently needed. NFAP2, an antifungal protein (AFP) secreted by Neosartorya (Aspergillus) fischeri, is a promising candidate. We investigated the ability of C. albicans to develop resistance to NFAP2 in a microevolution experiment compared with generic fluconazole (FLC). C. albicans adapted to only 1 x minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of NFAP2 compared with 32 x MIC of FLC. Genome analysis revealed non-silent mutations in only two genes in NFAP2-resistant strains and in several genes in FLC-resistant strains. Resistance development to NFAP2 did not influence cell morphology. The susceptibility of NFAP2-resistant strains did not change to FLC, amphotericin B, micafungin, terbinafine. These strains did not show altered susceptibility to AFPs from Penicillium chrysogenum, except one which had less susceptibility to P. chrysogenum antifungal protein B. FLC-resistant strains had decreased susceptibility to terbinafine and NFAP2, but not to other drugs and AFPs from P. chrysogenum. NFAP2- and FLC-resistant strains showed decreased and increased NFAP2 binding and uptake, respectively. The development of resistance to NFAP2 decreased tolerance to cell wall, heat, and UV stresses. The development of FLC resistance increased tolerance to cell wall stress and decreased tolerance to heat and UV stresses. Resistance to NFAP2 did not have significant metabolic fitness cost and could not increase virulence, compared with resistance to FLC.
Microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?