Differential effects of aging and epilepsy in discriminating and reactivating memories

Xin You Tai,Arjune Sen,Masud Husain,Sanjay G Manohar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.13.593984
2024-05-15
Abstract:Pattern separation and pattern completion are distinct neurocognitive processes involved in encoding and retrieval of memories. However, there is currently no robust behavioural task in humans to measure both processes within the same paradigm. We describe the Memory Pinhole task, a novel paradigm which offers a distinct measure of each process, applied to healthy young, healthy older and people with epilepsy. Both pattern separation and pattern completion are observed in healthy younger individuals. A pattern completion deficit is seen in people with epilepsy, while the healthy older cohort show a deficit in pattern separation. To understand the neural mechanisms, we simulated human performance using an auto-associative neural network. Modelling indicated that disruption in different neuronal populations could explain the distinct memory profiles observed in ageing and epilepsy. These results demonstrate that pattern separation and pattern completion are distinct processes that can be measured from a single behavioural task and are differentially affected by ageing and epilepsy.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the current lack of a behavioral task that can simultaneously measure two memory processes: pattern separation and pattern completion. Specifically: 1. **Differences between pattern separation and pattern completion**: Pattern separation refers to how the brain stores similar memories as different neural representations, while pattern completion refers to how the brain restores complete and accurate neural representations when receiving partial or ambiguous cues. These two processes are considered independent in theoretical and computational models, but are difficult to distinguish in human behavioral tasks. 2. **Limitations of existing tasks**: Existing behavioral tasks usually can only focus on one of these processes, or although they attempt to measure both processes simultaneously, they have methodological deficiencies. For example, most tasks have only one behavioral outcome (correct or incorrect), and it is difficult to extract two independent measurement indicators from it. In addition, some studies use the false recognition rate as an indicator of pattern completion activity, but this may be affected by other factors, such as poor original stimulus encoding or memory interference. 3. **The proposed new task**: To overcome these limitations, the author has developed a new cognitive task - the Pinhole Memory Task. This task provides a more accurate method to distinguish these two memory processes by simultaneously evaluating the abilities of pattern separation and pattern completion in one paradigm. Specifically, the task designs different probe conditions (such as similarity degree and occlusion degree), and uses probes in different dimensions to evaluate the effects of pattern separation and pattern completion respectively. 4. **Research objectives**: By testing the Pinhole Memory Task in healthy young people, healthy elderly people, and epilepsy patients, the author aims to verify the effectiveness of this new task and explore the specific effects of age and disease on pattern separation and pattern completion. In addition, the author also uses a modified Hopfield network model to simulate behavioral data in order to better understand the underlying neural mechanisms. In summary, the goal of this paper is to provide a more reliable method for studying pattern separation and pattern completion by developing and validating a new behavioral task, and to explore the differences in these memory processes among different populations and the neurobiological mechanisms behind them.