Effectiveness of iso-inertial resistance training on eccentric and concentric power, physical performance, and risk of falls in physically active middle-older adults: a randomised controlled trial

Aida Cadellans-Arroniz,David Blanco,Marc Madruga-Perera,Victor Zarate-Lozano,Flora Dantony,Daniel Romero-Rodriguez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.13.24307107
2024-05-13
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of iso-inertial resistance training on eccentric power compared to gravitational training in physically active middle-older adults. Methods: Parallel-group, randomised controlled trial at Espai Esport Wellness Center (Granollers, Spain). Forty-four physically active adults (>57 years of age) were randomised to iso-inertial (n=21) or gravitational (n=23) training groups (R software; 1:1 ratio). Participants had to complete a 6-week training program (2 sessions/week) consisting of three exercises (forward lunge, side lunge, forward lunge with row). Primary outcome: power in the eccentric phase of each exercise evaluated with both iso-inertial and gravitational devices. Secondary outcomes: concentric power, physical performance, risk of falls. Only outcome evaluators were blinded. We used multivariate linear regression models to analyse the effect of interventions. Results: Iso-inertial training showed better eccentric power gains than gravitational training for iso-inertial system evaluation, although the difference was only statistically significant for the side lunge. Forward lunge: between-group difference 3.99 W (95% CI: -3.99 to 11.33, p: 0.28); side lunge: difference 8.50 W (95% CI: 2.13 to 14.87; p: 0.01); forward lunge with row: difference 14.07 W (95% CI: -2.07 -to 30.20, p: 0.09). We observed no differences for the gravitational system evaluation nor for concentric power, physical performance, and risk of falls. The two groups improved remarkably from baseline for all outcomes. Conclusions: Iso-inertial resistance training might lead to better eccentric power gains than gravitational training. Both approaches seem equally effective in improving concentric power and physical performance, and reducing the risk of falls. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( ).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?