Abstract:Background: Adverse pregnancy outcomes are predictive for future cardiovascular disease risk, but it is unclear whether they play a causal role. We conducted a Mendelian randomization study with males as a negative control population to estimate the associations between genetic liability to adverse pregnancy outcomes and risk of coronary artery disease. Methods: We extracted uncorrelated (R2<0.01) single-nucleotide polymorphisms strongly associated (p-value<5e-8) with miscarriage, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preeclampsia, placental abruption, poor fetal growth and preterm birth from relevant genome-wide association studies. Genetic associations with risk of coronary artery disease were extracted separately for females and males. The main analysis was the inverse-variance weighted analysis, while MR Egger, weighted median and weighted mode regression, bidirectional analyses, and the negative control population with males were sensitivity analyses to evaluate bias due to genetic pleiotropy. Results: The number of cases for the adverse pregnancy outcomes ranged from 691 (182,824 controls) for placental abruption to 49,996 (174,109 controls) for miscarriage, and there were 22,997 (310,499 controls) and 54,083 (240,453 controls) cases of coronary artery disease for females and males, respectively. We observed an association between genetic liability to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and preeclampsia, and to some extent gestational diabetes, poor fetal growth and preterm birth, with an increased risk of coronary artery disease among females, which was supported by the MR Egger, weighted median and weighted mode regressions. However, in the negative control population of males, we observed largely the same associations as for females. Conclusions: The associations between adverse pregnancy outcomes and coronary artery disease risk were likely driven by confounding (e.g., shared genetic liability). Thus, our study does not support the hypothesis that adverse pregnancy outcomes are causal risk factors for cardiovascular diseases.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore whether there is a causal relationship between adverse pregnancy outcomes and the risk of coronary artery disease. Specifically, through the Mendelian randomization method and using men as a negative control population, the researchers evaluated the impact of genetic susceptibility and adverse pregnancy outcomes (such as miscarriage, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, pre - eclampsia, placental abruption, fetal growth restriction and preterm birth) on the risk of coronary artery disease. The main purpose of the study was to determine whether these adverse pregnancy outcomes are causal risk factors for cardiovascular diseases or just correlations due to common genetic susceptibility. ### Research Background There is a strong association between adverse pregnancy outcomes (such as preterm birth) and the future risk of cardiovascular diseases in mothers. Given that approximately one - third of women will experience adverse pregnancy outcomes in their lifetimes, institutions such as the American Heart Association recommend considering the history of adverse pregnancy outcomes when evaluating the future risk of cardiovascular diseases. However, it is still unclear whether these adverse pregnancy outcomes play a causal role in the development of cardiovascular diseases. ### Research Methods The researchers used single - nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as genetic instrumental variables and the two - sample Mendelian randomization method to evaluate the relationships between genetic susceptibility, adverse pregnancy outcomes and the risk of coronary artery disease. The study included seven adverse pregnancy outcomes and analyzed women and men separately. To reduce confounding factors caused by genetic ancestry, the study only included individuals of European descent. ### Main Findings - **Women**: Genetic susceptibility was significantly associated with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) and pre - eclampsia, and there was a trend indicating associations with miscarriage, gestational diabetes, fetal growth restriction and preterm birth as well. - **Men**: A similar pattern of associations was observed in men, suggesting that these associations may be mainly due to common genetic susceptibility rather than the adverse pregnancy outcomes themselves. ### Conclusions The research results support that adverse pregnancy outcomes (especially HDP and pre - eclampsia) are important predictors of the future risk of coronary artery disease. However, these associations are likely to be caused by common genetic susceptibility rather than directly by adverse pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, this study does not support the hypothesis that adverse pregnancy outcomes are causal risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. ### Significance This study provides a new perspective for understanding the complex relationship between adverse pregnancy outcomes and cardiovascular diseases. Although adverse pregnancy outcomes can be used as predictors of the future risk of cardiovascular diseases, they are not direct causal risk factors. This finding is of great significance for clinical practice and the formulation of public health policies.

Adverse pregnancy outcomes and coronary artery disease risk: A negative control Mendelian randomization study

Causal effects between negative moods and cardiovascular diseases: a Mendelian randomization study

Parental genetically predicted liability for coronary heart disease and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a cohort study

Assessing the causal association of pregnancy complications with diabetes and cardiovascular disease

Gestational diabetes and future cardiovascular diseases: associations by sex-specific genetic data

Rheumatoid arthritis and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study

Maternal Hypertension Increases Risk of Preeclampsia and Low Fetal Birthweight: Genetic Evidence From a Mendelian Randomization Study

Genetically Driven Adiposity Traits Increase the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease Independent of Blood Pressure, Dyslipidaemia, Glycaemic Traits

Genetic Liability to Depression and Risk of Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Infarction, and Other Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Causal relationships exist between polycystic ovary syndrome and adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: a Mendelian randomization study

Risk of pre-eclampsia in patients with a maternal genetic predisposition to common medical conditions: a case-control study

Dyslipidemia and Risk of Preeclampsia: A Multiancestry Mendelian Randomization Study

Association Between Periodontitis and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Two-Sample Mendelian Randomisation Study

Exploring the association between grip strength and adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: A Mendelian randomization study

Mendelian randomization supports genetic liability to hospitalization for COVID-19 as a risk factor of pre-eclampsia

Causal Association of Rheumatoid Arthritis With Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Genetic Evidence From Mendelian Randomization

Causal pathways in preeclampsia: a Mendelian randomization study in European populations

Association between Maternal and Fetal Genetic Variants and Preeclampsia: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

Causal associations between Helicobacter pylori infection and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Causal effects of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy on future gynecologic tumors: A two‐sample Mendelian randomization study

Association and mediation pathways of maternal hyperglycaemia and liability to gestational diabetes with neonatal outcomes: A two‐sample Mendelian randomization study