Abstract:Behavioural experiences activate the FOS transcription factor in sparse populations of neurons that are critical for encoding and recalling specific events1-3. However, there is limited understanding of the mechanisms by which experience drives circuit reorganization to establish a network of Fos-activated cells. It is also not known whether FOS is required in this process beyond serving as a marker of recent neural activity and, if so, which of its many gene targets underlie circuit reorganization. Here we demonstrate that when mice engage in spatial exploration of novel environments, perisomatic inhibition of Fos-activated hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons by parvalbumin-expressing interneurons is enhanced, whereas perisomatic inhibition by cholecystokinin-expressing interneurons is weakened. This bidirectional modulation of inhibition is abolished when the function of the FOS transcription factor complex is disrupted. Single-cell RNA-sequencing, ribosome-associated mRNA profiling and chromatin analyses, combined with electrophysiology, reveal that FOS activates the transcription of Scg2, a gene that encodes multiple distinct neuropeptides, to coordinate these changes in inhibition. As parvalbumin- and cholecystokinin-expressing interneurons mediate distinct features of pyramidal cell activity4-6, the SCG2-dependent reorganization of inhibitory synaptic input might be predicted to affect network function in vivo. Consistent with this prediction, hippocampal gamma rhythms and pyramidal cell coupling to theta phase are significantly altered in the absence of Scg2. These findings reveal an instructive role for FOS and SCG2 in establishing a network of Fos-activated neurons via the rewiring of local inhibition to form a selectively modulated state. The opposing plasticity mechanisms acting on distinct inhibitory pathways may support the consolidation of memories over time.

Neuropeptide Y co-opts neuronal ensembles for memory lability and stability

Dorsal CA1 interneurons contribute to acute stress-induced spatial memory deficits.

Functionally Distinct Neuronal Ensembles Within the Memory Engram

An Excitatory Neural Assembly Encodes Short-Term Memory in the Prefrontal Cortex.

Biphasic Npas4 expression promotes inhibitory plasticity and suppression of fear memory consolidation in mice

GluN2D NMDA Receptors Gate Fear Extinction Learning and Interneuron Plasticity

Dynamic tripartite construct of interregional engram circuits underlies forgetting of extinction memory

Neuropeptide F inhibits dopamine neuron interference of long-term memory consolidation in Drosophila

Synaptic rearrangement of NMDA receptors controls memory engram formation and malleability in the cortex

NMDA Receptor-Dependent Synaptic Potentiation via APPL1 Signaling Is Required for the Accessibility of a Prefrontal Neuronal Assembly in Retrieving Fear Extinction.

Synaptic plasticity-dependent competition rule influences memory formation

Bidirectional perisomatic inhibitory plasticity of a Fos neuronal network

Induction of Activity Synchronization among Primed Hippocampal Neurons out of Random Dynamics is Key for Trace Memory Formation and Retrieval

Cerebellar interneurons control fear memory consolidation via learning-induced HCN plasticity

Perineuronal Nets Protect Long-Term Memory by Limiting Activity-Dependent Inhibition from Parvalbumin Interneurons.

Abrogation of presynaptic facilitation at hippocampal mossy fiber synapses impacts neural ensemble activity and spatial memory

Common Molecular Pathways Mediate Long-Term Potentiation of Synaptic Excitation and Slow Synaptic Inhibition

Modulation of Temporoammonic-CA1 Synapses by Neuropeptide Y is Through Y1 Receptors

Activity-induced synaptic delivery of the GluN2A-containing NMDA receptor is dependent on endoplasmic reticulum chaperone Bip and involved in fear memory

Associative Memory Extinction Is Accompanied by Decayed Plasticity at Motor Cortical Neurons and Persistent Plasticity at Sensory Cortical Neurons

Bidirectional regulation of hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity and its influence on opposing forms of memory