Phylogeny of neocortical-hippocampal projections provides insight in the nature of human memory

Daniel Reznik,Piotr Majka,Marcello G P Rosa,Menno P Witter,Christian F Doeller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.09.593130
2024-05-09
Abstract:Throughout mammalian evolution, the hippocampal region, unlike the neocortex, largely preserved its cytoarchitectural organization and its role in mnemonic functions. This contrast raises the possibility that the hippocampal region receives different types of cortical input across species, which may be reflected in species-specific memory-related differences. To test this hypothesis, we examined differences in unimodal and transmodal cortical input to the hippocampal region in the rat, marmoset, macaque and human. Our results demonstrate that unlike unimodal cortical input, transmodal cortical input to the hippocampal region was selectively preserved during mammalian evolution. These findings suggest that memory-related processes in different species likely operate on different types of sensory information. Our observations provide a comparative anatomical framework elucidating the process of dimensionality reduction underlying the formation of human memory.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to explore how phylogenetic differences in neocortex - hippocampal projections during mammalian evolution affect the memory characteristics of different species. Specifically, the researchers examined the changes in unimodal and cross - modal cortical inputs to the hippocampal region in four species, namely rats, marmosets, macaques, and humans. The main questions of the paper are: 1. **Has the type of cortical input received by the hippocampal region changed during mammalian evolution?** 2. **How do these changes reflect on the memory functions of different species?** To answer these questions, the researchers analyzed animal anatomical tracing data and human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) connectivity data, focusing on the projection patterns from unimodal and cross - modal cortices to the parahippocampal region (including the medial temporal cortex, perirhinal cortex, and parahippocampal cortex). The results show that cross - modal cortical inputs are selectively retained during mammalian evolution, while unimodal cortical inputs are significantly reduced. This finding implies that memory processing in different species may rely on different types of sensory information, thus explaining the differences in memory functions among species. ### Main Conclusions: - **Reduction in Unimodal Cortical Input**: From rats to humans, the proportion of projections from the unimodal cortex to the parahippocampal region gradually decreases. - **Increase in Cross - Modal Cortical Input**: The proportion of projections from the cross - modal cortex to the parahippocampal region remains relatively stable or even increases during evolution. - **Differences in Information Types for Memory Processing**: Memory processing in different species may rely on different types of sensory information, which reflects the diversity of memory functions among species. ### Significance: - **Importance of Cross - Modal Input**: The increase in cross - modal input may help extract more abstract and comprehensive information, supporting higher - level cognitive functions such as human episodic memory and future thinking. - **Constructive Nature of Memory**: The dominance of cross - modal input supports the constructive nature of memory, that is, memory is not a simple reproduction of the original sensory stimuli but a reconstruction based on low - dimensional abstract information. Through these findings, the paper provides a comparative anatomical framework to explain the phenomenon of dimensionality reduction in human memory formation and supports the constructive rather than reproductive nature of memory.