Plasma p-tau217 predicts cognitive impairments up to ten years before onset in normal older adults

Yara Yakoub,Fernando Gonzalez-Ortiz,Nicholas J Ashton,Christine Déry,Cherie Strikwerda-Brown,Frédéric St-Onge,Valentin Ourry,Michael Schöll,Maiya Geddes,Simon Ducharme,Maxime Montembeault,Pedro Rosa-Neto,Jean Paul-Soucy,John Breitner,Henrik Zetterberg,Kaj Blennow,Judes Poirier,Sylvia Villeneuve,PREVENT-AD Research Group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.09.24307120
2024-05-09
Abstract:Importance: Positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers are the gold standard for detection of Alzheimer amyloid and tau in vivo. Such imaging can identify cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals who will subsequently develop cognitive impartment (CI). Plasma biomarkers would be more practical than PET or even cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) assays in clinical settings. Objective: Assess the prognostic accuracy of plasma p–tau217 in comparison to CSF and PET biomarkers for predicting the clinical progression from CU to CI. Design: In a cohort of elderly at high risk of developing Alzheimer″s dementia (AD), we measured the proportion of CU individuals who developed CI, as predicted by Aβ (A+) and/or tau (T+) biomarker assessment from plasma, CSF, and PET. Results from each method were compared with (A–T–) reference individuals. Data were analyzed from June 2023 to April 2024. Setting: Longitudinal observational cohort. Participants: Some 228 participants from the PREVENT–AD cohort were CU at the time of biomarker assessment and had 1 – 10 years of follow–up. Plasma was available from 215 participants, CSF from 159, and amyloid– and tau–PET from 155. Ninety–three participants had assessment using all three methods (main group of interest). Progression to CI was determined by clinical consensus among physicians and neuropsychologists who were blind to plasma, CSF, PET, and MRI findings, as well as APOE genotype. Exposures: Plasma Aβ42/40 was measured using IP-MS; CSF β42/40 using Lumipulse; plasma and CSF p–tau217 using UGOT assay. Aβ–PET employed the 18F–NAV4694 ligand, and tau–PET used 18F–flortaucipir. Main Outcome: Prognostic accuracy of plasma, CSF, and PET biomarkers for predicting the development of CI in CU individuals. Results: Cox proportional hazard models indicated a greater progression rate in all A+T+ groups compared to A–T– groups (HR = 6.61 [95% CI = 2.06 – 21.17] for plasma, 3.62 [ 1.49 – 8.81] for CSF and 9.24 [ 2.34 – 36.43] for PET). The A–T+ groups were small, but also characterized with individuals who developed CI. Plasma biomarkers identified about five times more T+ than PET. Conclusion and relevance: Plasma p–tau217 assessment is a practical method for identification of persons who will develop cognitive impairment up to 10 years later.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?