Exonic splice variant discovery using in vitro models of inherited retinal disease

Nathaniel Kevin Mullin,Laura R. Bohrer,Kristin R. Anfinson,Jeaneen L. Andorf,Robert F. Mullins,Budd A. Tucker,Edwin M. Stone
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.06.592740
2024-05-10
Abstract:Correct identification of the molecular consequences of pathogenic genetic variants is essential to the development of allele-specific therapies. However, in some cases, such molecular effects may be ambiguous following genetic sequence analysis alone. One such case is exonic, codon-altering variants that are also predicted to disrupt normal RNA splicing. Here, we identify such cases in the context of inherited retinal disease. NR2E3 c.932G>A (p.Arg311Gln) is a variant commonly associated with Enhanced S Cone Syndrome (ESCS). Previous studies using mutagenized cDNA constructs have shown that the arginine to glutamine substitution at position 311 of NR2E3 does not meaningfully diminish function of the rod-specific transcription factor. Using retinal organoids, we explored the molecular consequences of NR2E3 c.932G>A when expressed endogenously during human rod photoreceptor cell development. Retinal organoids carrying the NR2E3 c.932G>A allele expressed a transcript containing a 186-nucleotide deletion of exon 6 within the ligand binding domain. This short transcript was not detected in control organoids or control human donor retina samples. A minigene containing exons 5 and 6 of NR2E3 showed sufficiency of the c.932G>A variant to cause the observed splicing defect. These results support the hypothesis that the pathogenic NR2E3 c.932G>A variant leads to photoreceptor disease by causing a splice defect and not through an amino acid substitution as previously supposed. They also explain the relatively mild effect of Arg311Gln on NR2E3 function in vitro. We also used in silico prediction tools to show that similar changes are likely to affect other inherited retinal disease variants in genes such as CEP290, ABCA4, and BEST1.
Genetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?