Abstract:BACKGROUND The complex 3-dimensional (3D) nature of anatomical abnormalities in congenital heart disease (CHD) necessitates multidisciplinary group discussions centered around the review of medical images such as magnetic resonance imaging. Currently, group viewings of medical images are constrained to 2-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional displays of 3D scans. However, 2D display methods could introduce additional challenges since they require physicians to accurately reconstruct the images mentally into 3D anatomies for diagnosis, staging, and planning of surgery or other therapies. Virtual reality (VR) software may enhance diagnosis and care of CHD via 3D visualization of medical images. Yet, present-day VR developments for medicine lack the emphasis on multiuser collaborative environments, and the effect of displays and level of immersion for diagnosing CHDs have not been studied. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracies and preferences of various display systems, including the conventional 2D display and a novel group VR software, in group discussions of CHD. METHODS A total of 22 medical trainees consisting of 1 first-year, 10 second-year, 4 third-year, and 1 fourth-year residents and 6 medical students, who volunteered for the study, were formed into groups of 4 to 5 participants. Each group discussed three diagnostic cases of CHD with varying structural complexity using conventional 2D display and group VR software. A group VR software, Cardiac Review 3D, was developed by our team using the Unity engine. By using different display hardware, VR was classified into nonimmersive and full-immersive settings. The discussion time, diagnostic accuracy score, and peer assessment were collected to capture the group and individual diagnostic performances. The diagnostic accuracies for each participant were scored by two experienced cardiologists following a predetermined answer rubric. At the end of the study, all participants were provided a survey to rank their preferences of the display systems for performing group medical discussions. RESULTS Diagnostic accuracies were highest when groups used the full-immersive VR compared with the conventional and nonimmersive VR (χ 2 2 =9.0, P =.01) displays. Differences between the display systems were more prominent with increasing case complexity (χ 2 2 =14.1, P <.001) where full-immersive VR had accuracy scores that were 54.49% and 146.82% higher than conventional and nonimmersive VR, respectively. The diagnostic accuracies provided by the two cardiologists for each participant did not statistically differ from each other ( t =–1.01, P =.31). The full-immersive VR was ranked as the most preferred display for performing group CHD discussions by 68% of the participants. CONCLUSIONS The most preferred display system among medical trainees for visualizing medical images during group diagnostic discussions is full-immersive VR, with a trend toward improved diagnostic accuracy in complex anatomical abnormalities. Immersion is a crucial feature of displays of medical images for diagnostic accuracy in collaborative discussions.

Immersive 3D Visualisations (3D Printing, Virtual Reality) enhance spatial understanding of complex congenital cardiac defects

3D-Printed Model Improves Clinical Assessment of Surgeons on Anatomy

Investigation of the Clinical Value of Four Visualization Modalities for Congenital Heart Disease

Clinical Applications of Mixed Reality and 3D Printing in Congenital Heart Disease

Clinical Value of Virtual Reality versus 3D Printing in Congenital Heart Disease

A Novel Virtual Reality Medical Image Display System for Group Discussions of Congenital Heart Disease: Development and Usability Testing (Preprint)

A Novel Virtual Reality Medical Image Display System for Group Discussions of Congenital Heart Disease: Development and Usability Testing

Clinical acceptance of advanced visualization methods: a comparison study of 3D-print, virtual reality glasses, and 3D-display

Spatial Orientation in Cardiac Ultrasound Images Using Mixed Reality: Design and Evaluation

Comparative effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) vs 3D printed models of congenital heart disease in resident and nurse practitioner educational experience

Utilizing Three-Dimensional Printing Technology to Assess the Feasibility of High-Fidelity Synthetic Ventricular Septal Defect Models for Simulation in Medical Education

Advanced Medical Use of Three-Dimensional Imaging in Congenital Heart Disease: Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality, Virtual Reality, and Three-Dimensional Printing

Usage of 3D models of tetralogy of Fallot for medical education: impact on learning congenital heart disease

Clinical value of patient-specific three-dimensional printing of congenital heart disease: Quantitative and qualitative assessments

Enhancing educational experience through establishing a VR database in craniosynostosis: report from a single institute and systematic literature review

Fast-track virtual reality software to facilitate 3-dimensional reconstruction in congenital heart disease

Criss-cross heart three-dimensional printed models in medical education: A multicenter study on their value as a supporting tool to conventional imaging

Domain expert evaluation of advanced visual computing solutions and 3D printing for the planning of the left atrial appendage occluder interventions

Three-dimensional printing of mitral valve models using echocardiographic data improves the knowledge of cardiology fellow physicians in training

Effectiveness of three-dimensional printed and virtual reality models in learning the morphology of craniovertebral junction deformities: a multicentre, randomised controlled study

Cinematic Rendering in Mixed-Reality Holograms: A New 3D Preoperative Planning Tool in Pediatric Heart Surgery