Individual variability in the relationship between physiological and resting-state fMRI metrics

Stefano Moia,Gang Chen,Eneko Uruñuela,Rachael C. Stickland,Maite Termenon,César Caballero-Gaudes,Molly G. Bright
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.02.592237
2024-05-05
Abstract:Cerebrovascular Reactivity (CVR), the brain’s vascular response to a vasodilatory stimulus, can be measured using fMRI during breathing challenges that modulate arterial CO levels. CVR is an important indicator of cerebrovascular health, although its estimation can be challenging due to the extra experimental setup and/or the subject compliance required. To overcome these limitations, summary metrics based on resting state fluctuations (RSF), such as the (fractional) amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (f/ALFF) and the resting state fluctuation amplitude (RSFA), have been proposed as alternative estimates of CVR, as they are frequently associated with vascular and physiological factors. Previous studies have reported a significant relationship between CVR estimates obtained by means of respiratory paradigms and RSF metrics. However, the total sample sizes, considering both subjects and sessions, are typically small, and not all studies agree on the degree of the relationship. Furthermore, to our knowledge, these studies have only reported cross-sectional analyses, whereas intra-subject longitudinal relationships between CVR estimates and RSF metrics are unknown. Leveraging a unique dense sampling dataset in which resting state and breath-hold multi-echo fMRI were collected in 7 subjects with 10 sessions each, we provide evidence of high individual variability in the inter-session (i.e. intra-subject) relationship between RSF metrics and CVR. These results indicate that RSF metrics might not be a suitable proxy of CVR in clinical settings or for BOLD signal calibration as they may not properly account for intra-individual physiological variations in BOLD fMRI data.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the relationship between physiological fluctuation indicators in resting - state functional magnetic resonance imaging (resting - state fMRI, RS - fMRI), such as amplitude of low - frequency fluctuation (ALFF); resting - state fluctuation amplitude (RSFA), and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) obtained through the breath - holding challenge task, especially the relationship within individuals (i.e., across multiple scanning sessions). Specifically, the researchers utilized a unique densely - sampled data set, in which 7 subjects underwent resting - state and breath - holding multi - echo fMRI scans in 10 different sessions to explore whether these resting - state indicators can serve as reliable surrogate indicators of CVR, especially in clinical settings or for BOLD signal calibration. The main objective of the study is to verify whether these resting - state indicators can stably reflect individual CVR changes at different time points, thereby evaluating their effectiveness and limitations as CVR proxy indicators. The research background indicates that CVR is an important indicator for evaluating cerebrovascular health, but traditional measurement methods require additional experimental devices and the cooperation of subjects, which limits their wide application. Therefore, finding simple and reliable surrogate indicators of CVR has important clinical significance. However, current research results on the relationship between RS - fMRI indicators and CVR are inconsistent, especially lacking the exploration of the longitudinal relationship within individuals. This paper aims to fill this research gap and provide a more in - depth understanding.