Abstract:The ability of a host plant to act as a substrate or media for larval development may depend on how good it is at offering suitable nutrients for bacterial growth. In this study, we hypothesized that the suitability of a fruit type for fruit fly larval development is positively correlated with the ability of that fruit to act as a substrate/media for fruit fly symbiotic bacterial growth. We allowed a single female fruit fly to lay eggs on five different host fruits, then we monitored the larval development parameters across five generations and analyzed the bacterial community structure of larvae developing in 2 of these hosts (apple and banana) at the first and fifth generations. Results indicate that the larval length and dry weight did not vary significantly across experimental generations, but were greatly affected by fruit types and larval stages. The larval development time was extended considerably in apple and tomato but shortened in banana and mango. There was a significant shift in bacterial community structure and composition across fruits and generations. The bacterial community of larvae within the same fruit (apple and banana) clustered and was similar to the parental female (with the predominance of Proteobacteria), but there was a shift at the fifth generation (dominance of Firmicutes). Banana offered a suitable better development and growth to larvae and bacteria, respectively, compared to apple in which reduced larval development and bacterial growth were recorded. Although additional experiments are needed to adequately show that the differences in microbiome seen in fruit fly larval guts are the actual driver of different developmental outcomes of larvae on the different fruits, at the very least, our study has provided intriguing data suggesting interaction between the diets and gut microbial communities on insect development.Importance and Significance of the study Tephritid fruit flies entertain complex interactions with gut bacteria. These bacteria are known to provide nutritional benefits to their hosts, by supplementing missing nutrients from the host diets and regulating energy balance. Foraging for food is a risky exercise for the insect which is exposed to ecological adversities, including predators. Therefore, making beneficial choice among available food substrates is a question of survival for the flies and bacteria as well. Our study demonstrates interactions between the host fly and its intestinal bacteria in sustaining the larval development while foraging optimally on different fruit types. These findings add a novel step into our understanding of the interactions between the gut microbial communities and B. dorsalis and provide avenues for developing control strategies to limit the devastative incidence of the fly.

Humidity determines penetrance of a latitudinal gradient in genetic selection on the microbiota by

Environment and diet shape the geography-specific Drosophila melanogaster microbiota composition

The microbiota influences the Drosophila melanogaster life history strategy

Latitudinal clines in climate and sleep patterns shape disease outcomes in Drosophila melanogaster infected by Metarhizium anisopliae

Selection for stress tolerance and longevity in Drosophila melanogaster have strong impacts on microbiome profiles

How gut microbiome interactions affect nutritional traits of Drosophila melanogaster

Microbiome interactions shape host fitness

Long-term gut microbiome dynamics in Drosophila melanogaster reveal environment-specific associations between bacterial taxa at the family level

Gut microbiota affects development and olfactory behavior in Drosophila melanogaster

The Host As the Driver of the Microbiota in the Gut and External Environment of Drosophila Melanogaster.

Salt concentration in substrate modulates the composition of bacterial and yeast microbiomes of Drosophila melanogaster

Sex-Dependent Effects of the Microbiome on Foraging and Locomotion in Drosophila suzukii

Population mixing mediates the intestinal flora composition and facilitates invasiveness in a globally invasive fruit fly

Genetic diversity and natural selection in wild fruit flies revealed by whole-genome resequencing.

Intestinal bacteria modulate the foraging behavior of the oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Microbial communities of the house fly Musca domestica vary with geographical location and habitat

The Drosophila model for microbiome research

Microbiota Influences Fitness and Timing of Reproduction in the Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster

Mosquitoes reared in distinct insectaries within an institution in close spatial proximity possess significantly divergent microbiome

Mosquitoes reared in distinct insectaries within an institution in close spatial proximity possess significantly divergent microbiomes

Host Fruit As a Suitable Bacteria Growth Substrate That Promotes Larval Development of Bactrocera Dorsalis (diptera: Tephritidae)