Relapse prediction in multiple myeloma patients treated with isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone

Even Moa Myklebust,Fredrik Schjesvold,Arnoldo Frigessi,Kevin Leder,Jasmine Foo,Alvaro Köhn-Luque
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.02.24306607
2024-05-06
Abstract:Multiple myeloma (MM) patients experience repeated cycles of treatment response and relapse, yet despite close monitoring of disease status through M protein measurements, no standard model exists for relapse prediction in MM. We investigate the feasibility of predicting relapse using a hierarchical Bayesian model of subpopulation dynamics by training and testing the model on 229 patients from the IKEMA trial. After observing between 11 and 18 treatment cycles, the model predicted relapse within six cycles with an average sensitivity between 60 and 80 %, and an average specificity between 60 and 90 %. A model of linear extrapolation is preferable when patients have been observed for less than 6 cycles, but for longer observation windows the hierarchical Bayesian model is preferred. Including available baseline and longitudinal covariate information did not improve predictive accuracy. A survival analysis showed that two model parameters separated patients into groups with significantly different PFS ( 0.001).
Oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to address the issue of relapse prediction in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after receiving treatment with isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone. Specifically, the goal of the study is to develop a model that can predict whether patients will relapse within the next few treatment cycles. To achieve this goal, the research team employed a hierarchical Bayesian model to simulate the dynamic changes of tumor subpopulations and trained and tested the model based on M-protein measurement data from 229 patients participating in the IKEMA trial. After observing 11 to 18 treatment cycles, the model was able to predict relapse within the next 6 cycles, with average sensitivity and specificity reaching 60% to 80% and 60% to 90%, respectively. Additionally, the study explored the impact of including baseline and longitudinal covariate information on prediction accuracy, but the results indicated that this additional information did not significantly improve prediction accuracy. Survival analysis showed that two parameters in the model could divide patients into two groups with significantly different progression-free survival (PFS). In summary, this study successfully achieved effective relapse prediction in multiple myeloma patients by developing a hierarchical Bayesian model. This helps guide monitoring frequency in clinical practice, reduces uncertainty for patients, and provides more time to choose the best subsequent treatment plan for each patient. Furthermore, this work highlights the potential of mathematical modeling in the fields of multiple myeloma and personalized medicine.