The mechanical and sensory signature of plant-based and animal meat

Skyler R. St. Pierre,Ethan C Darwin,Divya Adil,Magaly C Aviles,Archer M Date,Reese Dunne,Yanav Lall,Maria Parra Vallecillo,Valerie Ann Perez Medina,Kevin Linka,Marc Elliot Levenston,Ellen Kuhl

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.25.591207

2024-10-14

Abstract:Eating less meat is associated with a healthier body and planet. Yet, we remain reluctant to switch to a plant-based diet, largely due to the sensory experience of plant-based meat. Food scientists characterize meat using a double compression test, which only probes one-dimensional behavior. Here we use tension, compression, and shear tests--combined with constitutive neural networks--to automatically discover the behavior of eight plant-based and animal meats across the entire three-dimensional spectrum. We find that plant-based sausage and hotdog, with stiffnesses of 95.9±14.1kPa and 38.7±3.0kPa, successfully mimic their animal counterparts, with 63.5±45.7kPa and 44.3±13.2 kPa, while tofurky is twice as stiff, and tofu is twice as soft. Strikingly, a complementary food tasting survey produces in nearly identical stiffness rankings for all eight products (ρ=0.833, p=0.015). Probing the fully three-dimensional signature of meats is critical to understand subtle differences in texture that may result in a different perception of taste.

Bioengineering