Race, ethnicity, and risk for colonization and infection with key bacterial pathogens: a scoping review

Esther E. Avendano,Sarah Addison Blackmon,Nanguneri Nirmala,Courtney W. Chan,Rebecca A. Morin,Sweta Balaji,Lily McNulty,Samson Argaw Alemu,Shira Doron,Maya L. Nadimpalli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.24.24306289

2024-08-09

Abstract:Background: Racial and ethnic disparities in infectious disease burden have been reported in the USA and globally, most recently for COVID-19. It remains unclear whether such disparities also exist for priority bacterial pathogens that are increasingly antimicrobial-resistant. We conducted a scoping review to summarize published studies that report on colonization or community-acquired infection with pathogens among different races and ethnicities. Methods: We conducted an electronic literature search of MEDLINE, Daily, Global Health, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science from inception to January 2022 for eligible observational studies. Abstracts and full-text publications were screened in duplicate for studies that reported data for race or ethnicity for at least one of the pathogens of interest. Results: Fifty-four observational studies in 59 publications met our inclusion criteria. Studies reported results for (n=56), (n=8), (n=2), Enterobacterales (n=1), (n=1), and (n=1), and were conducted in the USA (n=42), Israel (n=5), New Zealand (n=4), Australia (n=2), and Brazil (n=1). USA studies most often examined Black and Hispanic minority groups and regularly reported a higher risk of these pathogens in Black persons and mixed results for Hispanic persons. Ethnic minority groups were often reported to be at a higher risk in other countries. Conclusion: Sufficient evidence was identified to justify systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the relationship between race, ethnicity, and community-acquired and , although data were rare for other pathogens. We recommend that future studies clarify whether race and ethnicity data are self-reported, collect race and ethnicity data in conjunction with the social determinants of health, and make a concerted effort to include non-English speakers and Indigenous populations from the Americas, when possible.

Public and Global Health

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?

This paper aims to explore whether racial and ethnic differences affect the colonization or infection risk of specific bacterial pathogens, especially those bacterial pathogens that are acquired in the community environment and have an increasing antibiotic - resistance (AMR). Specifically, the authors conducted a scoping review to summarize the published studies that reported the colonization or community - acquired infection of different racial and ethnic groups in the following bacterial pathogens:

- **Staphylococcus aureus**
- **Escherichia coli**
- **Pseudomonas aeruginosa**
- **Enterobacteriales**
- **Enterococcus faecium**
- **Klebsiella pneumoniae**

### Research background

There are differences in the burden of infectious diseases among races and ethnicities, especially in the United States and other countries. Recent studies on COVID - 19 have also shown such differences. However, it is unclear whether there are similar differences for priority bacterial pathogens (especially those with increasing antibiotic resistance).

### Research objectives

Through this scoping review, the authors hope to answer the following questions:
1. **Whether there are racial and ethnic differences**: Are there differences in the colonization or community - acquired infection risk of the above - mentioned bacterial pathogens among different racial and ethnic groups?
2. **Evidence summary**: What evidence in the existing literature supports the existence of these differences?
3. **Future research directions**: Provide guidance for future research, especially on how to collect and analyze data related to social determinants more accurately to better understand these differences.

### Methods

To answer these questions, the authors conducted an extensive literature search covering multiple databases (such as MEDLINE, Global Health, Embase, etc.) and screened the eligible observational studies. Eventually, they identified 54 independent studies from the United States, Israel, New Zealand, Australia, Brazil and other places, involving multiple bacterial pathogens.

### Conclusions

The study shows that race and ethnicity are indeed related to the colonization or infection risk of certain bacterial pathogens, especially in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. However, for other pathogens, the evidence is relatively limited. Therefore, the authors suggest that future research should collect and analyze data on race, ethnicity and social determinants more meticulously and strive to include non - English speakers and Native American populations.

### Keywords

- Community - acquired
- Antibiotic resistance
- Health inequality
- Race
- Ethnicity

Through this review, the authors hope to provide a basis for future systematic reviews and meta - analyses and promote more research on the role of race and ethnicity in the risk of bacterial infections.