The Mycelium as a Network
Mark D. Fricker,Luke L. M. Heaton,Nick S. Jones,Lynne Boddy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/9781555819583.ch15
2017-09-05
Abstract:Growth as an interconnected mycelial network is characteristic of filamentous fungi and has been subject to scientific investigation since the seminal works of Buller at the start of the 20th century (1 – 3). We have increasingly detailed understanding of the fundamental cellular processes needed to form a network, such as hyphal tip growth (4), septation (5 , 6), hyphal orientation (7), branching (8), and fusion (9 – 13) (Fig. 1A and C). In contrast, we know far less about the molecular events at the next physical scale that leads to hyphal aggregation and hyphal differentiation, and how these impact physiological processes such as long‐distance resource distribution and biomass recycling. For example, while direct uptake and intrahyphal nutrient diffusion may be sufficient to sustain short‐range local growth when resources are abundant (14), long‐distance translocation is required to deliver nutrients at a sufficient rate to growing tips, particularly in fungi that form large networks on the forest floor that are too large to distribute nutrients through diffusion alone. We know little about the quantitative contribution of different potential transport pathways, such as cytoplasmic streaming, vesicle transport, growth‐induced mass flow, or evaporative mass flow, to net fluxes and overall nutrient dynamics, and how they might vary between species and developmental stage (15 – 17). Nevertheless, the behavior of the growing mycelial network emerges from the interaction of many such processes and requires an integrated view to understand the overall impact on fungal behavior (18 – 20). Our understanding is further constrained by inferences drawn from a limited number of genetically tractable model filamentous species grown under laboratory conditions (abundant, evenly dispersed, low‐molecular‐weight resources, high relative humidity, constant light and temperature) compared with real‐world conditions (patchy, recalcitrant, ephemeral resources, fluctuating temperature, light and relative humidity).