Abstract:Error awareness is a fundamental mechanism in humans. Through traditional psychological tasks, certain neural activities that represent errors in objective manners have been identified. However, there is limited knowledge on how humans subjectively determine right from wrong in moral contexts. In this study, participants (N=39) mentally simulated themselves as the agents of moral and immoral behaviors, while viewing a series of actions with EEG recording and MRI scanning, respectively. A significant difference in error-related negativity (ERN) was observed among morally wrong scenarios, accompanied by higher wrongfulness ratings. Additionally, individual differences in guilt-proneness could predict the subjects’ ERN amplitude. The ERN amplitude was correlated with the BOLD activity in the anterior mid-cingulate cortex and anterior insula to immoral scenarios, reflecting error awareness toward moral wrongfulness. The late potential component displayed greater negativity to immoral scenarios and was correlated with BOLD activities in the amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and temporoparietal junction, indicating cognitive and affective evaluation in moral judgment. In line with the moral dynamic framework, our results demonstrated individual variability in moral judgments, as indicated by dispersed and overlapping cognitive neural networks. This suggests that subjective evaluations of wrongfulness are underpinned by neural mechanisms, associated with those involved in objective error awareness.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to explore how the human brain integrates the sense of error in subjective moral judgments. Specifically, researchers simulated participants as the subjects of moral or immoral behaviors by having them undergo electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans while watching a series of actions. The main goal of the study was to determine whether the error - related negativity (ERN), an event - related potential (ERP) component related to objective errors, could also reflect the perception of "error" in subjective moral judgments and predict an individual's guilt - proneness. In addition, the study also used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure whole - brain activity and explored the potential of ERN and the late positive potential (LP) in predicting brain activity patterns. ### Research Background - **Error - related Negativity (ERN)** : ERN is a key indicator for early error processing, usually appearing within 50 - 150 milliseconds after an error occurs, and is mainly prominent on frontal and central electrodes. It is related to conflict monitoring and is considered to be involved in the conscious perception of errors. - **Complexity of Moral Judgments** : In real life, moral judgments are more complex than the binary classification in experimental settings and are influenced by multiple factors, such as moral severity, individual differences, etc. - **Guilt** : Guilt is a common moral emotion, closely related to moral judgments, and can prompt people to take altruistic actions. Guilt - proneness (the trait that an individual is prone to feel negative emotions after making a mistake) is related to reducing the frequency of immoral behaviors. ### Research Methods - **Participants** : 39 healthy participants (19 females), aged between 20 and 30 years, underwent the EEG and fMRI versions of the mental simulation task of moral behavior. - **Stimulus Materials** : Photos of 58 volunteers were used, and each group of photos contained three different action scenes, depicting harmful and harmless behaviors respectively. - **Experimental Procedure** : Participants simulated themselves as the agents of actions from a first - person perspective while watching animations, and then judged whether the behaviors were good or bad and evaluated their feelings of warmth or guilt. - **Data Collection and Analysis** : - **EEG** : The brain electrical activities of 32 channels were recorded, with the focus on analyzing the ERN and LP components. - **fMRI** : Functional images were acquired using a 3T MRI system, with the focus on analyzing the brain region activities related to guilt and guilt - proneness. ### Main Findings - **Moral Judgments and Guilt** : Participants judged harmful behaviors more quickly and reported stronger feelings of guilt. - **ERP Results** : - **ERN** : In harmful behavior trials, the amplitude of ERN was more negative and was positively correlated with participants' guilt - proneness. - **LP** : In harmful behavior trials, the amplitude of LP was larger, and the tool scenes elicited stronger responses than the hand scenes. - **fMRI Results** : Although the whole - brain analysis did not find significant differences, in the analysis of specific regions of interest (ROI), it was found that the activities in some brain regions increased in harmful behavior trials, including the anterior mid - cingulate cortex, anterior insula, amygdala, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and right temporoparietal junction. ### Conclusion The research results show that ERN related to objective errors not only reflects the perception of "error" in subjective moral judgments but also can predict an individual's guilt - proneness. This provides a new perspective for understanding the neural mechanisms of moral judgments, indicating that subjective error awareness and objective error awareness have similarities in neural mechanisms.

A Libra in the Brain: Neural Correlates of Error Awareness Predict Moral Wrongness and Guilt Proneness

When morality opposes the law: An fMRI investigation into punishment judgments for crimes with good intentions

The neural signature of an erroneous thought

To Praise or to Blame? Neural Signals Predict Divergent Responses to Moral Hypocrisy

Contextual and Perceptual Brain Processes Underlying Moral Cognition: A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Moral Reasoning and Moral Emotions

The Neurobiology of Moral Cognition: Relation to Theory of Mind, Empathy, and Mind-Wandering

A functional neuroimaging investigation of Moral Foundations Theory

Unethical amnesia brain: Memory and metacognitive distortion induced by dishonesty

Neural correlates of moral judgments in first- and third-person perspectives: implications for neuroethics and beyond

Neural underpinnings of morality judgment and moral aesthetic judgment

Frontiers in diabetic kidney disease: introduction.

Neural correlates of the judgment of lying: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

A Priority MAC Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks with Multiple Channels

The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care

Exploring the neural correlates of (altered) moral cognition in psychopaths

Psychological and Brain Responses to Artificial Intelligence's Violation of Community Ethics

Guilty Artificial Minds

Damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex impairs judgment of harmful intent

Neural indicators of error processing in generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and major depressive disorder.

The influence of error detection and error significance on neural and behavioral correlates of error processing in a complex choice task

Neural correlates of individual differences in moral identity and its positive moral function