Abstract:A chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging (ChIA-PET) approach is used to delineate chromatin interactions mediated by RNA polymerase II in several different stem-cell populations; putative long-range promoter–enhancer interactions are inferred, indicating that linear juxtaposition does not necessarily guide enhancer target selection and prevalent cell-specific enhancer usage. Gene transcription requires dynamic chromatin connectivity between promoters bound by RNA polymerase II and their corresponding distal-acting enhancers. In this paper the authors use the ChIA-PET (chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging) approach to delineate chromatin interactions mediated by RNA polymerase II in embryonic stem cells, neural stem cells and neurosphere progenitor cells. Putative enhancer–promoter interactions can be inferred, and many enhancers associate with promoters located beyond their nearest active genes, indicating that linear juxtaposition does not necessarily guide enhancer target selection. This work illustrates the possible importance of underlying chromatin structures in nuclear function. In multicellular organisms, transcription regulation is one of the central mechanisms modelling lineage differentiation and cell-fate determination1. Transcription requires dynamic chromatin configurations between promoters and their corresponding distal regulatory elements2. It is believed that their communication occurs within large discrete foci of aggregated RNA polymerases termed transcription factories in three-dimensional nuclear space3. However, the dynamic nature of chromatin connectivity has not been characterized at the genome-wide level. Here, through a chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging approach3,4,5 using an antibody that primarily recognizes the pre-initiation complexes of RNA polymerase II6, we explore the transcriptional interactomes of three mouse cells of progressive lineage commitment, including pluripotent embryonic stem cells7, neural stem cells8 and neurosphere stem/progenitor cells9. Our global chromatin connectivity maps reveal approximately 40,000 long-range interactions, suggest precise enhancer–promoter associations and delineate cell-type-specific chromatin structures. Analysis of the complex regulatory repertoire shows that there are extensive colocalizations among promoters and distal-acting enhancers. Most of the enhancers associate with promoters located beyond their nearest active genes, indicating that the linear juxtaposition is not the only guiding principle driving enhancer target selection. Although promoter–enhancer interactions exhibit high cell-type specificity, promoters involved in interactions are found to be generally common and mostly active among different cells. Chromatin connectivity networks reveal that the pivotal genes of reprogramming functions are transcribed within physical proximity to each other in embryonic stem cells, linking chromatin architecture to coordinated gene expression. Our study sets the stage for the full-scale dissection of spatial and temporal genome structures and their roles in orchestrating development.

Widespread impact of nucleosome remodelers on transcription at cis-regulatory elements

Single-cell Multi-Scale Footprinting Reveals the Modular Organization of DNA Regulatory Elements

Enhancer switching in cell lineage priming is linked to eRNA, Brg1's AT-hook, and SWI/SNF recruitment

ATP-dependent remodeling of chromatin condensates uncovers distinct mesoscale effects of two remodelers

Chromatin Connectivity Maps Reveal Dynamic Promoter–enhancer Long-Range Associations

Interactome Maps of Mouse Gene Regulatory Domains Reveal Basic Principles of Transcriptional Regulation.

Coordination of m(6)A mRNA Methylation and Gene Transcription by ZFP217 Regulates Pluripotency and Reprogramming

Enhancers as non-coding RNA transcription units: recent insights and future perspectives

Long non-coding RNAs direct the SWI/SNF complex to cell-specific enhancers

RNA Exosome-Regulated Long Non-Coding RNA Transcription Controls Super-Enhancer Activity.

Enhancer RNAs: a missing regulatory layer in gene transcription

Integrative network analysis identifies cell-specific <i>trans</i> regulators of m<SUP>6</SUP>A

Ectopic enhancer–enhancer interactions as causal forces driving RNA‐directed DNA methylation in gene regulatory regions

Decomposition of Rna Methylome Reveals Co-Methylation Patterns Induced by Latent Enzymatic Regulators of the Epitranscriptome

Mechanistic basis of gene regulation by SRCAP and H2A.Z

ncRNA- and Pc2 Methylation-Dependent Gene Relocation between Nuclear Structures Mediates Gene Activation Programs

Ncrnas, Subnuclear Architecture, And Relocation Of Regulated Transcription Units: A Strategy For Controlling Regulated Gene Programs In The Three Dimensional Space Of The Nucleus

Extensive Promoter-Centered Chromatin Interactions Provide A Topological Basis for Transcription Regulation

Non-Coding, RNAPII-Dependent Transcription at the Promoters of rRNA Genes Regulates Their Chromatin State in S. cerevisiae

A unified model of gene expression control by cohesin and CTCF

Modulation of gene expression dynamics by co-transcriptional histone methylations