The Effects of Bipolar Disorder Granule Cell Hyperexcitability and Lithium Therapy on Pattern Separation in a Computational Model of the Dentate Gyrus

Selena Singh,Anouar Khayachi,Shani Stern,Thomas Trappenberg,Martin Alda,Abraham Nunes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.09.588764
2024-04-13
Abstract:Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) derived hippocampal dentate granule cell-like neurons from individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) are hyperexcitable and more spontaneously active relative to healthy control (HC) neurons. These abnormalities are normalised after the application of lithium in neurons derived from lithium responders (LR) only. How these abnormalities impact hippocampal microcircuit computation is not understood. We aimed to investigate the impacts of BD-associated abnormal granule cell (GC) activity on pattern separation (PS) using a computational model of the dentate gyrus (DG). We used parameter optimization to fit the parameters of biophysically realistic granule cell (GC) models to electrophysiological data from iPSC GCs from patients with BD. These cellular models were incorporated into DG networks to assess impacts on PS using an adapted spatiotemporal task. Relationships between BD, lithium and spontaneous activity were analysed using linear mixed effects modelling. Lithium and BD negatively impacted PS, consistent with clinical reports of cognitive slowing and memory impairment during lithium therapy. By normalising spontaneous activity levels, lithium improved PS performance in LRs only. Improvements in PS after lithium therapy in LRs may therefore be attributable to the normalisation of spontaneous activity levels, rather than reductions in GC intrinsic excitability as we hypothesised. Our results agree with a hypothesised relationship between behavioural mnemonic discrimination and DG PS, as previous research has suggested that mnemonic discrimination improves after lithium therapy in lithium responders only. Our work can be expanded on in the future by simulating the effects of lithium-induced neurogenesis on PS.
Neuroscience
What problem does this paper attempt to address?