Abstract:Zhoumeng Lin, 1– 4, &ast Wei-Chun Chou, 1– 4, &ast Yi-Hsien Cheng, 3, 4 Chunla He, 5 Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere, 6, 7 Jim E Riviere 7, 8 1 Department of Environmental and Global Health, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; 2 Center for Environmental and Human Toxicology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; 3 Institute of Computational Comparative Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA; 4 Department of Anatomy and Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA; 5 Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; 6 Nanotechnology Innovation Center of Kansas State, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA; 7 Center for Chemical Toxicology Research and Pharmacokinetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA; 8 1Data Consortium, Kansas State University, Olathe, KS, USA &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Zhoumeng Lin, Department of Environmental and Global Health, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, 1225 Center Dr., Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA, Tel +1 352-273-6160, Email Background: Low delivery efficiency of nanoparticles (NPs) to the tumor is a critical barrier in the field of cancer nanomedicine. Strategies on how to improve NP tumor delivery efficiency remain to be determined. Methods: This study analyzed the roles of NP physicochemical properties, tumor models, and cancer types in NP tumor delivery efficiency using multiple machine learning and artificial intelligence methods, using data from a recently published Nano-Tumor Database that contains 376 datasets generated from a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. Results: The deep neural network model adequately predicted the delivery efficiency of different NPs to different tumors and it outperformed all other machine learning methods; including random forest, support vector machine, linear regression, and bagged model methods. The adjusted determination coefficients (R 2 ) in the full training dataset were 0.92, 0.77, 0.77 and 0.76 for the maximum delivery efficiency (DE max ), delivery efficiency at 24 h (DE 24 ), at 168 h (DE 168 ), and at the last sampling time (DE Tlast ). The corresponding R 2 values in the test dataset were 0.70, 0.46, 0.33 and 0.63, respectively. Also, this study showed that cancer type was an important determinant for the deep neural network model in predicting the tumor delivery efficiency across all endpoints (19– 29%). Among all physicochemical properties, the Zeta potential and core material played a greater role than other properties, such as the type, shape, and targeting strategy. Conclusion: This study provides a quantitative model to improve the design of cancer nanomedicine with greater tumor delivery efficiency. These results help to improve our understanding of the causes of low NP tumor delivery efficiency. This study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating artificial intelligence with PBPK modeling approaches to study cancer nanomedicine. Graphical Keywords: artificial intelligence, machine learning, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, nanomedicine, drug delivery, nanotechnology Graphical Global Cancer Statistics estimated that almost 10 million deaths occurred worldwide due to cancer in 2020. 1 The treatment of cancer remains a challenge. Traditional small molecule-based chemotherapy has limitations; such as adverse side effects, low therapeutic indices, low bioavailability, high-dose requirements, lack of specificity, and development of multi-drug resistance. 2 Recent advances in nanotechnology enabled nanoparticle (NP)-based drug formulations to be designed with superior properties compared to traditional small molecule chemotherapy, including high drug loading, specific targeting/delivery, and the ability to regulate the release of the anticancer drug in a controlled or sustained manner. 3 During the last 30 years, many nanomedicines were designed and tested to be effective in reducing the size of various tumor types in laboratory animals, 4,5 but only a limited number of nanomedicines have been translated to clinical success and approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) or European Medicines Agency (EMA). 6 Low clinical translation of animal results -Abstract Truncated-

Drug-loaded nanoparticles for cancer therapy: a high-throughput multicellular agent-based modeling study

Mechanistic modeling identifies drug-uptake history as predictor of tumor drug resistance and nano-carrier-mediated response

Nanodelivery of a Self-Assembling Prodrug with Exceptionally High Drug Loading Potentiates Chemotherapy Efficacy.

Modeling of Nanotherapy Response as a Function of the Tumor Microenvironment: Focus on Liver Metastasis

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Nanoparticle Biodistribution: A Review of Existing Models, Simulation Software, and Data Analysis Tools

An Integrated Multiscale Mechanistic Model for Cancer Drug Therapy

An artificial intelligence-assisted physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to predict nanoparticle delivery to tumors in mice

Mathematical modeling in cancer nanomedicine: a review

Advances in Mathematical Models of the Active Targeting of Tumor Cells by Functional Nanoparticles

A multiscale cell‐based model of tumor growth for chemotherapy assessment and tumor‐targeted therapy through a 3D computational approach

Developing an Agent-Based Drug Model to Investigate the Synergistic Effects of Drug Combinations

Kinetics of Nanomedicine in Tumor Spheroid as an In Vitro Model System for Efficient Tumor-Targeted Drug Delivery With Insights From Mathematical Models

Application of High-Z Gold Nanoparticles in Targeted Cancer Radiotherapy—Pharmacokinetic Modeling, Monte Carlo Simulation and Radiobiological Effect Modeling

Predictive Models of Diffusive Nanoparticle Transport in 3-Dimensional Tumor Cell Spheroids

Enhancing Drug Penetration in Solid Tumors Via Nanomedicine: Evaluation Models, Strategies and Perspectives

Nanoparticle Accumulation and Penetration in 3D Tumor Models: the Effect of Size, Shape, and Surface Charge

Abstract 5493: Mathematical modeling of antibody nanoconjugates transport quantifies the impact of the tumor microenvironment on drug penetration

Multistage Nanoparticle Delivery System-A New Approach to Cancer Therapeutics

Primary Human Breast Cancer-Associated Endothelial Cells Favor Interactions with Nanomedicines

Predicting Nanoparticle Delivery to Tumors Using Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Approaches

Multifunctional Nanoparticles in Precise Cancer Treatment: Considerations in Design and Functionalization of Nanocarriers.