The Efficacy of Psychological Interventions for Child and Adolescent PTSD: A Network Meta-Analysis

Thole H. Hoppen,Lena Wessarges,Marvin Jehn,Julian Mutz,Ahlke Kip,Pascal Schlechter,Richard Meiser-Stedman,Nexhmedin Morina
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.09.24305537
2024-08-22
Abstract:Importance: Pediatric post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a common and debilitating mental disorder. Yet, a comprehensive network meta-analysis examining the efficacy of psychological interventions is lacking. Objective: To synthesize all available evidence on psychological interventions for pediatric PTSD in a comprehensive network meta-analysis. Data Sources: PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and PTSDpubs were searched from inception to January 2nd 2024 and 74 related systematic reviews were screened. Study Selection: Two independent raters screened publications for eligibility. Inclusion criteria were: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) with ten or more patients per arm examining a psychological intervention for pediatric PTSD compared to a control group in children and adolescents (< 19 years) with full or subthreshold PTSD. Data Extraction and Synthesis: PRISMA guidelines were followed to synthesize and present evidence. Two independent raters extracted data and assessed risk of bias with Cochrane criteria. Random effects network meta-analyses were run. Main Outcome and Measures: Standardized mean differences (Hedges' g) in PTSD severity. Results: In total, 70 RCTs (N = 5,528 patients) were included. Most RCTs (74%) examined trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy interventions (TF-CBTs). At treatment endpoint, TF-CBTs, EMDR, multi-disciplinary treatments (MDTs), and non-trauma-focused interventions (non-trauma-focused interventions) were all efficacious in reducing PTSD when compared to passive control conditions, with large pooled effects (gs ≥ 0.86, all ps < .001) in the random effects network meta-analysis. TF-CBTs produced the strongest short-term effects relative to both passive and active control conditions and across all sensitivity analyses. In a sensitivity analysis including only trials with parent involvement, TF-CBTs were significantly more efficacious in reducing PTSD than non-trauma-focused interventions (g = 0.35, p = .026). Results for mid-term (up to 5 months posttreatment) and long-term data (6-24 months posttreatment) were very similar. Conclusions and Relevance: The present network meta-analysis is the most comprehensive summary of psychological treatments for pediatric PTSD to this date. Results confirm that TF-CBTs can efficaciously reduce PTSD symptom severity in children and adolescents in the short-, mid-, and long-term. More long-term data are needed for EMDR, MDTs, and non-trauma-focused interventions. Results of TF-CBTs are encouraging and disseminating these results may help reduce common treatment barriers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?