Abstract:Background and Purpose The pattern recognition receptors, formyl peptide receptors, FPR1 and FPR2, are G protein‐coupled receptors that recognize many different pathogen‐ and host‐derived ligands. While FPR1 conveys pro‐inflammatory signals, FPR2 is linked with pro‐resolving outcomes. To analyse how the two very similar FPRs exert opposite effects in modulating inflammatory responses despite their high homology, a shared expression profile on immune cells and an overlapping ligand repertoire, we questioned whether the signalling profile differs between these two receptors. Experimental Approach We deduced EC50 and Emax values for synthetic, pathogen‐derived and host‐derived peptide agonists for both FPR1 and FPR2 and analysed them within the framework of biased signalling. We furthermore investigated whether FPR isoform‐specific agonists affect the ex vivo lifespan of human neutrophils. Key results The FPRs share a core signature across signalling pathways. Whereas the synthetic WKYMVm and formylated peptides acted as potent agonists at FPR1, and at FPR2, only WKYMVm was a full agonist. Natural FPR2 agonists, irrespective of N‐terminal formylation, displayed lower activity ratios, suggesting an underutilized signalling potential of this receptor. FPR2 agonism did not counteract LPS‐induced neutrophil survival, indicating that FPR2 activation per se is not linked with a pro‐resolving function. Conclusion and Implications Activation of FPR1 and FPR2 by a representative agonist panel revealed a lack of a receptor‐specific signalling texture, challenging assumptions about distinct inflammatory profiles linked to specific receptor isoforms, signalling patterns or agonist classes. These conclusions are restricted to the specific agonists and signalling pathways examined.

Physiological bias governs neutrophil inflammatory threat perception

Two naturally occurring mutations of human GPR103 define distinct G protein selection bias

Functional profiling of the G protein-coupled receptor C3aR1 reveals ligand-mediated biased agonism

FPR2 signaling without β-arrestin recruitment alters the functional repertoire of neutrophils

A GPCR-neuropeptide axis dampens hyperactive neutrophils by promoting an alternative-like polarization during bacterial infection

Signaling by Neutrophil G Protein-Coupled Receptors that Regulate the Release of Superoxide Anions

Neutrophil chemoattractant receptors in health and disease: double-edged swords

Early tyrosine phosphorylation events following adenosine A2A receptor in human neutrophils: identification of regulated pathways

Comparative analysis of formyl peptide receptor 1 and formyl peptide receptor 2 reveals shared and preserved signalling profiles

Signal transduction pathways triggered by selective formylpeptide analogues in human neutrophils

The Two Formyl Peptide Receptors Differently Regulate GPR84-Mediated Neutrophil NADPH Oxidase Activity

Flavors of GPCR signaling bias

Mechanisms of signalling and biased agonism in G protein-coupled receptors

Neutrophil Recruitment Limited by High-Affinity Bent Β2 Integrin Binding Ligand in Cis.

Molecular mechanism of biased signaling in a prototypical G protein–coupled receptor

Co-option of Neutrophil Fates by Tissue Environments

Neutrophil cell surface receptors and their intracellular signal transduction pathways

Combinatorial expression of GPCR isoforms affects signalling and drug responses

Basic characteristics of the neutrophil receptors that recognize formylated peptides, a danger-associated molecular pattern generated by bacteria and mitochondria

GPCR signalling from within the cell

Exploring Bias in GPCR Signaling and its Implication in Drug Development: A One-Sided Affair