Abstract:Across the major taxonomical domains, synonymous codons of an amino acid are found to be used in unequal frequencies. This codon usage bias -- both in terms of the degree of bias and the identity of codons used -- is highly variable, even among closely related species. Within a species, genome-wide codon usage bias reflects a balance between adaptive and non-adaptive microevolutionary processes. Variation in these microevolutionary processes results in across-species variation in codon usage bias. As codon usage bias is tightly linked to important molecular and biophysical processes, it is critical to understand how changes to these processes drive changes to the microevolutionary processes. Here we employ a population genetics model of coding sequence evolution to quantify natural selection and mutation biases on a per-codon basis and estimate gene expression levels across the budding yeasts Saccharomycotina subphylum. We interrogate the impact of variation in molecular mechanisms hypothesized to be driving the microevolution of codon usage. We find that natural selection and mutation biases evolved rapidly over macroevolutionary time, with high variability between closely related species. The majority (320/327) of yeasts exhibited clear signals of translational selection, with selection coefficients being correlated with codon-specific estimates of ribosome waiting times (based on the tRNA adaptation index) within species. Across species, natural selection on codon usage correlated with changes to ribosome waiting times, indicating that tRNA pool evolution is a major factor driving changes to natural selection on codon usage. We find evidence that changes to tRNA modification expression can contribute to changes in natural selection across species independent of changes to tRNA gene copy number, suggesting tRNA modifications also play a role in shaping natural selection on codon usage. Our work firmly establishes how changes to microevolutionary processes can be driven by changes to molecular mechanisms, ultimately shaping the macroevolutionary variation of a trait.

Life with only 28 tRNAs: Reduced translation accuracy compensates for the lack of twelve tRNAs in

Perturbation of the Trna Tertiary Core Differentially Affects Specific Steps of the Elongation Cycle

The Yin and Yang of Trna: Proper Binding of Acceptor End Determines the Catalytic Balance of Editing and Aminoacylation

Copy number variation in tRNA isodecoder genes impairs mammalian development and balanced translation

Systematic analysis of tRNA transcription unit deletions in E. coli reveals insights into tRNA gene essentiality and cellular adaptation

Codon usage bias from tRNA's point of view: Redundancy, specialization, and efficient decoding for translation optimization

The layered costs and benefits of translational redundancy

Optimization of Codon Translation Rates via tRNA Modifications Maintains Proteome Integrity

Balanced Codon Usage Optimizes Eukaryotic Translational Efficiency.

Evolution of tRNA pool shapes variation in selection on codon usage across the Saccharomycotina subphylu

Posttranscriptional modification to the core of tRNAs modulates translational misreading errors

Preferred synonymous codons are translated more accurately: Proteomic evidence, among-species variation, and mechanistic basis

tRNA modifications tune decoding of codon pairs to prevent cellular quality control responses

Modifications in the T arm of tRNA globally determine tRNA maturation, function, and cellular fitness

Trade-offs between tRNA abundance and mRNA secondary structure support smoothing of translation elongation rate

Measuring the tolerance of the genetic code to altered codon size

Mistranslation of the genetic code by a new family of bacterial transfer RNAs

Synergistic effects of tRNA modification defects in Escherichia coli K12.

Evolving precision: rRNA expansion segment 7S modulates translation velocity and accuracy in eukaryal ribosomes

Decoding properties of tRNA leave a detectable signal in codon usage bias

Geometric alignment of aminoacyl-tRNA relative to catalytic centers of the ribosome underpins accurate mRNA decoding